Skip to main content

Annual report delayed is annual report denied

It is the annual general meeting ( AGM) season. The annual ritual of conducting the shareholder meetings, complete with tea, coffee, samosas and some incidental work such as passing of resolutions, begins somewhere in June and goes on till September.
An integral part of the season is the annual report, prepared in great detail and released to the shareholders.
It would contain audited annual accounts and the balance sheet, it had details about remuneration of key managers and even details of sexual harassment cases reported. Till now, it even contained the notice and agenda of the AGM.
The old listing regulations required that the AGM notice be posted on the stock exchanges 21 days in advance. Thus, the annual report became available in the public domain well before the AGM. Shareholders and other stakeholders had enough time to study the report and prepare themselves to face the management and ask relevant questions at the AGM.
Though at many AGMs this process is reduced to a joke by the usual suspects who start singing praises of the promoters and take up frivolous matters, there are many exceptions. It is the stuff of corporate folklore as to how Infosys co- founder Narayana Murthy was impressed by Mohandas Pai at one such AGM and invited him to join the management.
However, the new LODR (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, now in force, have considerably reduced the chances of another Pai event. Under the new Regulation 34( 1), the annual reports need to be sent to the exchanges “ within 21 days” of it being approved in the AGM, in line with the Companies Act, 2013.
Other provisions under Regulation 36 require the soft copies of annual reports sent to shareholders by e- mail for those who have declared their e- mail IDs. However, a large number, especially in nonmetro locations, do not have e- mail. The physical reports sent to these do not reach in time. For these people, the advance publication on the exchange site was a godsend, now gone.
Further, there is a wider community that is not a shareholder in each listed company. These include analysts, data aggregators, fund managers and even journalists. Reporting and analysis by these also help a shareholder to better understand a report and gather perspective. Under the new regime, these nonshareholders technically have no access to the annual report.
As if this is not enough, the Street is guffawing about companies that are not filing even the AGM notices, which still have to be filed 21 days in advance. The exchanges are yet to wake up and crack the whip.
What purpose does this move serve? Is there any logic? Or it is only a drafting anomaly? The only logical explanation is that if the report is published later, it could contain resolutions passed by shareholders in the AGM, rather than those proposed to be passed. It very rarely happens in listed companies that the resolutions proposed by the management do not get through, given the stranglehold of promoters over votes.
Since there are better ways of doing this than by creating an information asymmetry in the market between existing shareholders and potential ones, it makes one wonder if the measure was a drafting error. In either case, the anomaly deserves to be rectified.
The regulator should step in to ensure both annual reports and notices are available on exchange websites well in time.
Business Standard New Delhi, 21th June 2016

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

RBI deputy governor cautions fintech platform lenders on privacy concerns during loan recovery

  India's digital lending infrastructure has made the loan sanctioning system online. Yet, loan recovery still needs a “feet on the street” approach, Swaminathan J, deputy governor of the Reserve Bank of India, said at a media event on Tuesday, September 2, according to news agency ANI.According to the ANI report, the deputy governor flagged that fintech operators in the digital lending segment are giving out loans to customers with poor credit profiles and later using aggressive recovery tactics.“While loan sanctioning and disbursement have become increasingly digital, effective collection and recovery still require a 'feet on the street' and empathetic approach. Many fintech platforms operate on a business model that involves extending small-value loans to customers often with poor credit profiles,” Swaminathan J said.   Fintech platforms' business models The central bank deputy governor highlighted that many fintech platforms' business models involve providing sm

New income tax slab and rates for new tax regime FY 2023-24 (AY 2024-25) announced in Budget 2023

  Basic exemption limit has been hiked to Rs.3 lakh from Rs 2.5 currently under the new income tax regime in Budget 2023. Further, the income tax slabs in the new tax regime has been changed. According to the announcement, 5 income tax slabs will be there in FY 2023-24, from 6 income tax slabs currently. A rebate under Section 87A has been enhanced under the new tax regime; from the current income level of Rs.5 lakh to Rs.7 lakh. Thus, individuals opting for the new income tax regime and having an income up to Rs.7 lakh will not pay any taxes   The income tax slabs under the new income tax regime will now be as follows: Rs 0 to Rs 3 lakh - 0% tax rate Rs 3 lakh to 6 lakh - 5% Rs 6 lakh to 9 lakh - 10% Rs 9 lakh to Rs 12 lakh - 15% Rs 12 lakh to Rs 15 lakh - 20% Above Rs 15 lakh - 30%   The revised Income tax slabs under new tax regime for FY 2023-24 (AY 2024-25)   Income tax slabs under new tax regime Income tax rates under new tax regime O to Rs 3 lakh 0 Rs 3 lakh to Rs 6 lakh 5% Rs 6

Jaitley plans to cut MSME tax rate to 25%

Income tax for companies with annual turnover up to ?50 crore has been reduced to 25% from 30% in order to make Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (MSME) companies more viable and also to encourage firms to migrate to a company format. This move will benefit 96% or 6.67 lakh of the 6.94 lakh companies filing returns of lower taxation and make MSME sector more competitive as compared with large companies. However, bigger firms have shown their disappointment since the proposal for reducing tax rates was to make Indian firms competitive globally and it is the large firms that are competing globally. The Finance Minister foregone revenue estimate of Rs 7,200 crore per annum for this for this measure. Besides, the Finance Minister refrained from removing or reducing Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT), a popular demand from India Inc., but provided a higher period of 15 years for carry forward of future credit claims, instead of the existing 10-year period. “It is not practical to rem