Skip to main content

Singapore pact may be amended soon

Process unlikely to be a long drawn one, say officials
India will amend the Avoidance of Double Tax agreement with Singapore soon. The negotiation process is unlikely to be a long drawn one, since it requires a simple modification, according to officials in the income tax (I-T) department. Indian officials are in the process of reaching out to the Singaporean authorities for the amendment.
Singapore will likely get the same two-year transition benefit of 50 per cent capital gains tax like in the case of Mauritius. Limitation of Benefit is much higher in the case of Singapore, a threshold of Rs 50 lakh against Rs 27 lakh for Mauritius.
The southeast Asian nation has emerged as the largest contributor of foreign direct investment (FDI) in the last financial year. For the nine-month period between April and December 2015, Singapore accounted for Rs 71,195 crore in FDI against Rs 39,506 crore through Mauritius. The changes to India-Mauritius Double Taxation Avoidance Convention last week has put the focus on a similar treaty inked between India and Singapore in 2005.
While there were expectations that similar changes would be made to the Singapore treaty, finance minister Arun Jaitley had hinted on Monday this might not be automatic. The minister said that Singapore “is a separate sovereign state, it (Mauritius treaty) does not ipso facto automatically extend. The principles will have to be applied, but applied through a process of renegotiation”. He also recalled how renegotiations of the Mauritius treaty took nearly two decades.
Consultants felt that Singapore might also be keen to renegotiate as the current arrangement might not be attractive for investors. In a note released soon after the announcement of the Mauritius Protocol, BMR Advisors said, “Any tax treaty is bilateral agreement and, hence, an amended agreement will need to be reached with the Singapore government. This said, the Singapore government should be open to acceding to requests from the Indian government given that the existing Singapore Tax Treaty in its current form may not be attractive from an investor standpoint.”
Article 6 of the Protocol dated July 18, 2005 to the Singapore Tax Treaty provides that the benefits such as capital gains exemption under the Singapore Tax Treaty would remain in force only till the time Mauritius Tax Treaty provides for capital gains exemption on alienation of shares.
Accordingly, the benefits accorded under the Singapore Tax Treaty in this regard would fall away, unless amended.
Consultants said that given the Mauritius Tax Treaty benefits on alienation of shares would be available until March 31, 2017, even the Singapore Tax Treaty benefits for similar transfers should be available until March 31, 2017.
The BMR note added the government should come up with a level-playing field for investments from Mauritius and Singapore and avoid any arbitrage between jurisdictions. Accordingly, the grandfathering provisions should also be built in the Singapore Tax Treaty.
However, one will have to wait and watch the diplomatic discussions between India and Singapore in this regard, it added.
Like the Mauritius amendments, which leave out instruments other than shares, even the Singapore treaty changes are likely to stick to shares.
Paragraph 4 of Article 13 of the Singapore Tax Treaty replaced the earlier paragraphs 4, 5 and 6 of Article 13. Accordingly, it is likely that the erstwhile paragraphs 4, 5 and 6 will now be re-instated for paragraph 4 of the Singapore Tax Treaty.
Business Standard New Delhi,18th May 2016

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Govt’s gamble on GST cuts: What do the bond and currency markets signal?

  It’s not just humans who suffer from cognitive biases; markets do too. Interestingly, different financial markets exhibit distinct biases, each interpreting events through its own prism of prejudice. Take the recent announcements on GST reforms: equity markets have chosen to view them through the lens of growth, while bond and currency markets are focusing on potential macroeconomic risks—fiscal pressures and current account challenges. So, which lens captures the true pulse?Equity markets may be right in expecting GST reforms to revive consumption, which has remained lacklustre for a while. But the key question remains—will this revival come at the cost of broader macro stability?It is well known that consumption stocks have rallied since the GST rationalisation announcement. But what about bond markets? What signals are they sending since this rejig was announced from the ramparts of the Red Fort?The signs aren't encouraging. Bond prices have slumped and yields have surged sinc...

Luxury carmakers urge clarity on GST rates to boost festive season sales

  A clear picture regarding new GST rates at the earliest will help the overall auto industry, including the luxury car segment, to regain momentum in the ongoing quarter, which generally sees enhanced sales on account of the festive season.The high-powered GST Council, chaired by Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman, will meet on September 3-4 to discuss moving to a two-slab taxation.In an interaction with PTI, BMW Group India President and CEO Hardeep Singh Brar said the recent speculation about the change in GST rates has caused uncertainty in the minds of consumers.Consumer interest and demand is strong, but they (prospective buyers) have adopted a wait-and-watch approach, and this delayed decision-making is impacting new vehicle sales at a certain level, he noted."Expediting clarity on GST rates is essential to get back to speed and ensure the auto sector's contribution to economic growth during this quarter is robust," Brar stated.He also hoped that the sustainable p...

Sebi proposes tighter norms for green bond third-party reviewers

  Sebi on Friday said it has proposed to tighten the norms to appoint independent third-party reviewers or certifiers for green debt securities to align them with requirements for other ESG-linked bonds.In a draft circular, Sebi said that the current norms for green bonds, introduced in February 2023, lack detailed requirements around reviewer independence, conflict of interest mitigation, and disclosure standards that are now in place for other ESG-linked securities under a June 2025 circular.The regulator's latest proposal seeks public comments on a revised framework that would bring parity by incorporating comprehensive criteria for third-party certifiers of green bonds on non-convertible securities.Under the proposed norms, issuers of green debt securities will need to appoint reviewers who are independent of their management, directors, and key managerial personnel. These reviewers will be remunerated in a way that prevents any conflicts of interest and possess relevant expert...