Skip to main content

Norms to re- negotiate PPP contracts soon

The government is likely to make public its new framework on renegotiation of public- private partnership ( PPP) contracts in a month’s time.
The new framework will allow renegotiations based on sector- specific issues, especially for national highways and ports, and will provide greater flexibility to the parties involved.
This comes even as another PPP initiative, the proposed Public Utility Resolution of Disputes ( PPP) Bill, has been put on the back burner as the Centre has gone slow on its upcoming legislative agenda.
Finance Minister Arun Jaitley had announced a comprehensive review of renegotiations of PPP projects in his 2016- 17 Budget speech. He had also spoken of introducing a new Bill to deal with resolution of PPP disputes.
The new framework on renegotiation of such projects is partly based on the recommendations of the panel headed by former finance secretary Vijay Kelkar, and will distinguish quantified bid percentages and qualitative materiality type considerations. “The new framework will include thresholds on the size, cost and time projections of a project. For example, shorter term and lower cost projects might not be up for renegotiation,” said a senior government official. The Kelkar panel report, made public in December last year, says projects above a certain monetary and time threshold may only be renegotiated if there is evidence that the project is distress material and is likely to result in default under the concession agreement at some future point, and that it could cause adverse outcomes for the government and users of the concession assets.
The framework is also likely to make it clear that a project cannot be renegotiated if any event of distress was foreseeable at the time of financial closure, any event that would affect the concessionaire just as any other company in its ordinary course of business, like a change in law, any impact arising directly or indirectly from the performance, action or inaction of the concessionaire, and any failure of any associated party for concessionaire to perform or provide financing.
“The work on the framework is complete. It is doing the rounds of various ministries for their comments,” said the official quoted above, who added the matter might not require Cabinet approval.
However, sources said the proposed Public Utility (Resolution of Disputes) Bill announced by Jaitley is unlikely to be introduced even in the upcoming monsoon session of Parliament.
“A Public Utility (Resolution of Disputes) Bill will be introduced during 2016- 17 to streamline institutional arrangements for resolution of disputes in infrastructure related construction contracts, PPP and public utility contracts,” Jaitley had said in his Budget speech.
It is believed that faced with a disruptive Opposition in the Rajya Sabha, the government might cut back on its legislative agenda over the coming sessions and, instead, focus more on better implementation of existing laws.
Business Standard New Delhi, 11th May 2016

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Govt’s gamble on GST cuts: What do the bond and currency markets signal?

  It’s not just humans who suffer from cognitive biases; markets do too. Interestingly, different financial markets exhibit distinct biases, each interpreting events through its own prism of prejudice. Take the recent announcements on GST reforms: equity markets have chosen to view them through the lens of growth, while bond and currency markets are focusing on potential macroeconomic risks—fiscal pressures and current account challenges. So, which lens captures the true pulse?Equity markets may be right in expecting GST reforms to revive consumption, which has remained lacklustre for a while. But the key question remains—will this revival come at the cost of broader macro stability?It is well known that consumption stocks have rallied since the GST rationalisation announcement. But what about bond markets? What signals are they sending since this rejig was announced from the ramparts of the Red Fort?The signs aren't encouraging. Bond prices have slumped and yields have surged sinc...

Luxury carmakers urge clarity on GST rates to boost festive season sales

  A clear picture regarding new GST rates at the earliest will help the overall auto industry, including the luxury car segment, to regain momentum in the ongoing quarter, which generally sees enhanced sales on account of the festive season.The high-powered GST Council, chaired by Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman, will meet on September 3-4 to discuss moving to a two-slab taxation.In an interaction with PTI, BMW Group India President and CEO Hardeep Singh Brar said the recent speculation about the change in GST rates has caused uncertainty in the minds of consumers.Consumer interest and demand is strong, but they (prospective buyers) have adopted a wait-and-watch approach, and this delayed decision-making is impacting new vehicle sales at a certain level, he noted."Expediting clarity on GST rates is essential to get back to speed and ensure the auto sector's contribution to economic growth during this quarter is robust," Brar stated.He also hoped that the sustainable p...

Sebi proposes tighter norms for green bond third-party reviewers

  Sebi on Friday said it has proposed to tighten the norms to appoint independent third-party reviewers or certifiers for green debt securities to align them with requirements for other ESG-linked bonds.In a draft circular, Sebi said that the current norms for green bonds, introduced in February 2023, lack detailed requirements around reviewer independence, conflict of interest mitigation, and disclosure standards that are now in place for other ESG-linked securities under a June 2025 circular.The regulator's latest proposal seeks public comments on a revised framework that would bring parity by incorporating comprehensive criteria for third-party certifiers of green bonds on non-convertible securities.Under the proposed norms, issuers of green debt securities will need to appoint reviewers who are independent of their management, directors, and key managerial personnel. These reviewers will be remunerated in a way that prevents any conflicts of interest and possess relevant expert...