Skip to main content

Norms to re- negotiate PPP contracts soon

The government is likely to make public its new framework on renegotiation of public- private partnership ( PPP) contracts in a month’s time.
The new framework will allow renegotiations based on sector- specific issues, especially for national highways and ports, and will provide greater flexibility to the parties involved.
This comes even as another PPP initiative, the proposed Public Utility Resolution of Disputes ( PPP) Bill, has been put on the back burner as the Centre has gone slow on its upcoming legislative agenda.
Finance Minister Arun Jaitley had announced a comprehensive review of renegotiations of PPP projects in his 2016- 17 Budget speech. He had also spoken of introducing a new Bill to deal with resolution of PPP disputes.
The new framework on renegotiation of such projects is partly based on the recommendations of the panel headed by former finance secretary Vijay Kelkar, and will distinguish quantified bid percentages and qualitative materiality type considerations. “The new framework will include thresholds on the size, cost and time projections of a project. For example, shorter term and lower cost projects might not be up for renegotiation,” said a senior government official. The Kelkar panel report, made public in December last year, says projects above a certain monetary and time threshold may only be renegotiated if there is evidence that the project is distress material and is likely to result in default under the concession agreement at some future point, and that it could cause adverse outcomes for the government and users of the concession assets.
The framework is also likely to make it clear that a project cannot be renegotiated if any event of distress was foreseeable at the time of financial closure, any event that would affect the concessionaire just as any other company in its ordinary course of business, like a change in law, any impact arising directly or indirectly from the performance, action or inaction of the concessionaire, and any failure of any associated party for concessionaire to perform or provide financing.
“The work on the framework is complete. It is doing the rounds of various ministries for their comments,” said the official quoted above, who added the matter might not require Cabinet approval.
However, sources said the proposed Public Utility (Resolution of Disputes) Bill announced by Jaitley is unlikely to be introduced even in the upcoming monsoon session of Parliament.
“A Public Utility (Resolution of Disputes) Bill will be introduced during 2016- 17 to streamline institutional arrangements for resolution of disputes in infrastructure related construction contracts, PPP and public utility contracts,” Jaitley had said in his Budget speech.
It is believed that faced with a disruptive Opposition in the Rajya Sabha, the government might cut back on its legislative agenda over the coming sessions and, instead, focus more on better implementation of existing laws.
Business Standard New Delhi, 11th May 2016

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

RBI deputy governor cautions fintech platform lenders on privacy concerns during loan recovery

  India's digital lending infrastructure has made the loan sanctioning system online. Yet, loan recovery still needs a “feet on the street” approach, Swaminathan J, deputy governor of the Reserve Bank of India, said at a media event on Tuesday, September 2, according to news agency ANI.According to the ANI report, the deputy governor flagged that fintech operators in the digital lending segment are giving out loans to customers with poor credit profiles and later using aggressive recovery tactics.“While loan sanctioning and disbursement have become increasingly digital, effective collection and recovery still require a 'feet on the street' and empathetic approach. Many fintech platforms operate on a business model that involves extending small-value loans to customers often with poor credit profiles,” Swaminathan J said.   Fintech platforms' business models The central bank deputy governor highlighted that many fintech platforms' business models involve providing sm

Credit card spending growth declines on RBI gaze, stress build-up

  Credit card spends have further slowed down to 16.6 per cent in the current financial year (FY25), following the Reserve Bank of India’s tightening of unsecured lending norms and rising delinquencies, and increased stress in the portfolio.Typically, during the festival season (September–December), credit card spends peak as several credit card-issuing banks offer discounts and cashbacks on e-commerce and other platforms. This is a reversal of trend in the past three financial years stretching to FY21 due to RBI’s restrictions.In the previous financial year (FY24), credit card spends rose by 27.8 per cent, but were low compared to FY23 which surged by 47.5 per cent. In FY22, the spending increased 54.1 per cent, according to data compiled by Macquarie Research.ICICI Bank recorded 4.4 per cent gross credit losses in its FY24 credit card portfolio as against 3.2 per cent year-on-year. SBI Cards’ credit losses in the segment stood at 7.4 per cent in FY24 and 6.2 per cent in FY23, the rep

India can't rely on wealthy to drive growth: Ex-RBI Dy Guv Viral Acharya

  India can’t rely on wealthy individuals to drive growth and expect the overall economy to improve, Viral Acharya, former deputy governor of the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) said on Monday.Acharya, who is the C V Starr Professor of Economics in the Department of Finance at New York University’s Stern School of Business (NYU-Stern), said after the Covid-19 pandemic, rural consumption and investments have weakened.We can’t be pumping our growth through the rich and expect that the economy as a whole will do better,” he said while speaking at an event organised by Elara Capital here.f there has to be a trickle-down, it should have actually happened by now,” Acharya said, adding that when the rich keep getting wealthier and wealthier, they have a savings problem.   “The bank account keeps getting bigger, hence they look for financial assets to invest in. India is closed, so our money can't go outside India that easily. So, it has to chase the limited financial assets in the country and