Skip to main content

FSSAI to bring comprehensive recall policy by April

Regulator’s to- do list includes guidelines on traceability mechanism, food recall portal and final notification of product approval regulations
Almost after a year of no food product being pulled out of the market, the regulator has decided to bring a comprehensive recall policy this financial year.
The last big food recall was in June 2015, of Nestlé India’s Maggi noodles. The Food Safety and Standards Authority of India ( FSSAI) had ordered the removal on reports that it contained traces of lead and monosodium glutamate. Subsequent lab tests cleared Maggi and the product is now back on retail shelves.
In the making for five years, the draft procedure for a food product’s recall was put up for public comment on the body’s website last year by FSSAI, where it has remained. Its latest newsletter lists “ final notification of recall regulations’’ as among the 12 important things it plans for 2016- 17. Other items include guidelines on a traceability mechanism, a food recall portal, final notification of the product approval regulations and amendment of the Food Safety Act of 2006.
An industry representative said another round of deliberations with businesses is expected before finetuning the draft food recall procedures. Besides Maggi, several energy drinks, flavoured water, syrups and sauces had been recalled in the past for not adhering to prescribed food standards. While the current law has provision for a recall, there hasn’t been a foolproof policy or procedures, unlike in mature markets such as the US or Britain. In August 2015, FSSAI said it would not continue with the process of product approvals, citing a Supreme Court order allowing food and health care products to be launched freely. That saw the end of food recall, too.
According to the draft recall procedure, the objective is to “ guide the food business operators on how to carry out a recall process, using global identification systems such as barcode and other mechanisms like email, paper, fax, etc, which facilitates fast removal of the food under recall from the distribution chain…” The idea is also to inform consumers of the presence of such food in the market and ensure it is contained and destroyed or rendered safe. Once the policy comes into effect, it will be a guide to operators on how to establish a written “ recall plan” for executing such a process, in case the food is determined unsafe and to protect the health of consumers in such a situation.
It will be about the complete process of recall, post- recall report, closure of the recall process and followup action to prevent a recurrence.
The proposed regulation exempts retailers from having a recall plan unless they are also engaged in the manufacture or import of food. Restaurants, caterers and takeaway joints do not need to have a recall plan. But, every entity in the distribution chain must remove the recalled product, once notified.
The draft procedures say a recall of food made abroad may also be initiated by reports of health authorities or from information received directly from such authorities or otherwise.
Back in 2011, then FSSAI chairman P I Suvrathan had told this newspaper that food recall was a complex process and the Authority would come up with related norms in the following year.
WHAT’S ON OFFER
According to the draft recall procedure, the objective is to guide the food business operators on how to carry out a recall process, using global identification systems such as barcode and other mechanisms such as e- mail, paper, fax
The idea is also to inform consumers of the presence of such food in the market and ensure it is contained and destroyed
Once the policy comes into effect, it will be a guide to operators on how to establish a written ‘ recall plan’ for executing such a process
Business Standard New Delhi,16th May 2016

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Govt’s gamble on GST cuts: What do the bond and currency markets signal?

  It’s not just humans who suffer from cognitive biases; markets do too. Interestingly, different financial markets exhibit distinct biases, each interpreting events through its own prism of prejudice. Take the recent announcements on GST reforms: equity markets have chosen to view them through the lens of growth, while bond and currency markets are focusing on potential macroeconomic risks—fiscal pressures and current account challenges. So, which lens captures the true pulse?Equity markets may be right in expecting GST reforms to revive consumption, which has remained lacklustre for a while. But the key question remains—will this revival come at the cost of broader macro stability?It is well known that consumption stocks have rallied since the GST rationalisation announcement. But what about bond markets? What signals are they sending since this rejig was announced from the ramparts of the Red Fort?The signs aren't encouraging. Bond prices have slumped and yields have surged sinc...

Luxury carmakers urge clarity on GST rates to boost festive season sales

  A clear picture regarding new GST rates at the earliest will help the overall auto industry, including the luxury car segment, to regain momentum in the ongoing quarter, which generally sees enhanced sales on account of the festive season.The high-powered GST Council, chaired by Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman, will meet on September 3-4 to discuss moving to a two-slab taxation.In an interaction with PTI, BMW Group India President and CEO Hardeep Singh Brar said the recent speculation about the change in GST rates has caused uncertainty in the minds of consumers.Consumer interest and demand is strong, but they (prospective buyers) have adopted a wait-and-watch approach, and this delayed decision-making is impacting new vehicle sales at a certain level, he noted."Expediting clarity on GST rates is essential to get back to speed and ensure the auto sector's contribution to economic growth during this quarter is robust," Brar stated.He also hoped that the sustainable p...

Sebi proposes tighter norms for green bond third-party reviewers

  Sebi on Friday said it has proposed to tighten the norms to appoint independent third-party reviewers or certifiers for green debt securities to align them with requirements for other ESG-linked bonds.In a draft circular, Sebi said that the current norms for green bonds, introduced in February 2023, lack detailed requirements around reviewer independence, conflict of interest mitigation, and disclosure standards that are now in place for other ESG-linked securities under a June 2025 circular.The regulator's latest proposal seeks public comments on a revised framework that would bring parity by incorporating comprehensive criteria for third-party certifiers of green bonds on non-convertible securities.Under the proposed norms, issuers of green debt securities will need to appoint reviewers who are independent of their management, directors, and key managerial personnel. These reviewers will be remunerated in a way that prevents any conflicts of interest and possess relevant expert...