Skip to main content

Draft tax rule for avoiding Vodafone-type cases

The income tax (I-T) department has issued a proposed set of rules for computation of the 'fair market value' of assets for taxing any indirect transfer of assets abroad, to avoid Vodafone-type tax disputes in the future.
This comes almost a year after finance minister Arun Jaitley had clarified in the 2015-16 budget that indirect transfer abroad between two companies would draw tax if the value of Indian assets of the company concerned on the specified date exceeded Rs 10 crore and these represented at least 50 per cent of the value of all the assets owned by such a foreign company globally.
The budget provision had improved on the arbitrariness in the much-contested retrospective amendment to the I-T Act. Which had said the indirect transfers abroad would be liable to tax in India if the transfer derived value "substantially" from assets located in the country. The rules put out for stakeholder consultation on Monday give out the method of valuation of shares to compute the 'fair market value' of the assets. The government has sought comments on the rules and forms by this Sunday.
According to the official note, if the asset is the share of an Indian company listed on a recognised stock exchange, the fair market value of the share will be the price of such a share on the exchange. When the share is listed on more than one recognised exchange, the price on the bourse recording the highest volume of trading will be considered.
Where the asset is the share of an Indian company not listed on a recognised exchange on the specified date, the fair market value will the one determined by a merchant banker or an accountant 'in accordance with any internationally accepted pricing methodology for valuation of shares on arm's length basis and increased by the liability, if any, considered in such determination'.
If the assets are other than shares, then also the fair market value will be determined by the price it would fetch in the open market on a specified date determined by merchant bankers or accountants concerned.
Vipul Jhaveri, partner, Deloitte Haskins & Sells, said, "These rules essentially rely on fair valuation at an arm's length basis, conducted by a chartered accountant or merchant banker, and do not adopt the 'net asset value' principle which is applied in some situations under the I-T rules."
In the Vodafone dispute, Vodafone International Holdings BV, a Dutch company, bought 67 per cent stake in an Indian company, Hutchinson Essar (HEL), by buying 100 per cent stake in CGP (Holdings), a Cayman Islands company, in 2007. CGP, a subsidiary of Hutchinson Telecommunic-ations International, owned the Indian assets of HEL through a complicated network of intermediate entities. Vodafone did not pay tax to Indian authorities as it was an offshore deal. However, the latter said it was liable to be taxed in India since it involved indirect transfer of Indian assets.
After losing the case in the Supreme Court, the government had introduced indirect transfer levy with retrospective effect from April 1962, in 2012. After much criticism, the government had constituted a committee to look into any new case arising out of retrospective amendments of taxation. The Vodafone and Cairn cases are pending in arbitration.
CLEARING THE AIR
  • Budget 2015-16 says indirect transfer overseas would be taxable in India if Indian assets are more than Rs 10 crore and represent at least 50% of the value of all global assets owned by the company concerned
  •  
  • The much-criticised retrospective amendment to the Income Tax Act had made these transfers taxable in India if transfer derives substantial value from Indian assets
  •  
  • CBDT on Monday comes out with rules to measure fair market value of shares and assets
  •  
  • Provisions made in the Finance Act, 2015, are prospective
Business Standard New Delhi,24th May 2016

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

New income tax slab and rates for new tax regime FY 2023-24 (AY 2024-25) announced in Budget 2023

  Basic exemption limit has been hiked to Rs.3 lakh from Rs 2.5 currently under the new income tax regime in Budget 2023. Further, the income tax slabs in the new tax regime has been changed. According to the announcement, 5 income tax slabs will be there in FY 2023-24, from 6 income tax slabs currently. A rebate under Section 87A has been enhanced under the new tax regime; from the current income level of Rs.5 lakh to Rs.7 lakh. Thus, individuals opting for the new income tax regime and having an income up to Rs.7 lakh will not pay any taxes   The income tax slabs under the new income tax regime will now be as follows: Rs 0 to Rs 3 lakh - 0% tax rate Rs 3 lakh to 6 lakh - 5% Rs 6 lakh to 9 lakh - 10% Rs 9 lakh to Rs 12 lakh - 15% Rs 12 lakh to Rs 15 lakh - 20% Above Rs 15 lakh - 30%   The revised Income tax slabs under new tax regime for FY 2023-24 (AY 2024-25)   Income tax slabs under new tax regime Income tax rates under new tax regime O to Rs 3 lakh 0 Rs 3 lakh to Rs 6 lakh 5% Rs 6

Jaitley plans to cut MSME tax rate to 25%

Income tax for companies with annual turnover up to ?50 crore has been reduced to 25% from 30% in order to make Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (MSME) companies more viable and also to encourage firms to migrate to a company format. This move will benefit 96% or 6.67 lakh of the 6.94 lakh companies filing returns of lower taxation and make MSME sector more competitive as compared with large companies. However, bigger firms have shown their disappointment since the proposal for reducing tax rates was to make Indian firms competitive globally and it is the large firms that are competing globally. The Finance Minister foregone revenue estimate of Rs 7,200 crore per annum for this for this measure. Besides, the Finance Minister refrained from removing or reducing Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT), a popular demand from India Inc., but provided a higher period of 15 years for carry forward of future credit claims, instead of the existing 10-year period. “It is not practical to rem

Don't forget to verify your income tax return in August: Here's the process

  An ITR return needs to be verified within 120 days of filing of tax return. Now that you have filed your income tax return, remember to verify it because your return filing process is not complete unless you do so. The CBDT has reduced the time limit of ITR verification to 30 days (from 120 days) from the date of return submission. The new rule is applicable for the returns filed online on or after 1st August 2022. E-verification is the most convenient and instant method for verifying your ITR. However, if you prefer not to e-verify, you have the option to verify it by sending a physical copy of the ITR-V. Taxpayers who filed returns by July 31, 2023 but forget to verify their tax returns, will get the following email from the tax department, as per ClearTax. If your ITR is not verified within 30 days of e-filing, it will be considered invalid, and may be liable to pay a Late Fee. Aadhaar OTP | EVC through bank account | EVC through Demat account | Sending duly signed ITR-V through s