Skip to main content

Boost for innovation: India gets its first IPR policy

Trademark registration in just one month, check on film & music piracy
India unveiled a comprehensive Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) policy on Friday aimed fostering innovation, cutting delays in clearing patent, trademark and copyright applications, protecting traditional knowledge and encouraging entrepreneurship.
The National Intellectual Property Rights policy, which the Cabinet approved on Friday, will likely bring India’s IP regime in line with global standards and help improve its ranking in the World Bank’s Ease of Doing Business index.
The new policy will also help substantially cut the time taken on clearing the backlog of intellectual property rights (IPR) applications from the current five to seven years to 18 months by March 2018.
Trademark applications will likely get approved in one month by 2018, from 13 months currently.
“The policy aims to create and exploit synergies between all forms of intellectual property (IP), statutes concerned and agencies,” finance minister Arun Jaitley said after the Cabinet meeting.
The policy also puts a premium on enhancing access to healthcare, food security, environmental protection and prevents film and music piracy.
The Indian Cinematography Act, 1952 may be amended to “provide for penal provisions for illegal duplication of films,” the policy said.
An IPR policy is important for the government to formulate incentives in the form of tax concessions to encourage research and development (R&D). It is also critical to strengthen the Make In India, Startup and Digital India schemes.
It is expected to lay the future roadmap for intellectual property in India, besides putting in place an institutional mechanism for implementation, monitoring and review.
The idea is to incorporate global best practices in the Indian context and adapt to the same.
The IPR policy comes at a time when India and other emerging countries faces fresh challenges from the developed world and mega regional trade agreements such as the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP).
The US has kept India on a trade watchlist citing “longstanding systemic deficiencies” and some new concerns about its IPR regime.
But, the US noted, in its annual report last month called Special 301, India has engaged forcefully on the issue and “taken positive steps to address or avoid further erosions of the IPR regime”.
Under pressure from multiple US businesses, trade bodies and lawmakers, India was on the brink of being named to Special 301’s priority foreign country category in 2014, the worst designation from the US perspective that could have attracted trade sanctions.
The US trade representative, which compiles this annual report of countries that are harmful to American trading interests on account of IPR problems, held off the designation.
The Modi government has taken significant steps since including the national IPR policy.
India has maintained that its IPR regime was compatible with the trade related intellectual property rights (TRIPS) agreement of the World TradeOrganisation.
The US has been complaining against India’s policy towards compulsory licensing of pharmaceutical products, holding that it may weaken the global patent regime under TRIPS.
“The objective behind the IPR policy is quite clear, when there are new inventions, when there is growth in trade, commerce and industry, an IPR must be there to protect them,” Jaitley said
The new policy will now also cover music, industrial drawings and will protect public health, food security and environment, among other areas of socio-economic importance.
Hindustan Times New Delhi,14th May 2016

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Govt’s gamble on GST cuts: What do the bond and currency markets signal?

  It’s not just humans who suffer from cognitive biases; markets do too. Interestingly, different financial markets exhibit distinct biases, each interpreting events through its own prism of prejudice. Take the recent announcements on GST reforms: equity markets have chosen to view them through the lens of growth, while bond and currency markets are focusing on potential macroeconomic risks—fiscal pressures and current account challenges. So, which lens captures the true pulse?Equity markets may be right in expecting GST reforms to revive consumption, which has remained lacklustre for a while. But the key question remains—will this revival come at the cost of broader macro stability?It is well known that consumption stocks have rallied since the GST rationalisation announcement. But what about bond markets? What signals are they sending since this rejig was announced from the ramparts of the Red Fort?The signs aren't encouraging. Bond prices have slumped and yields have surged sinc...

Luxury carmakers urge clarity on GST rates to boost festive season sales

  A clear picture regarding new GST rates at the earliest will help the overall auto industry, including the luxury car segment, to regain momentum in the ongoing quarter, which generally sees enhanced sales on account of the festive season.The high-powered GST Council, chaired by Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman, will meet on September 3-4 to discuss moving to a two-slab taxation.In an interaction with PTI, BMW Group India President and CEO Hardeep Singh Brar said the recent speculation about the change in GST rates has caused uncertainty in the minds of consumers.Consumer interest and demand is strong, but they (prospective buyers) have adopted a wait-and-watch approach, and this delayed decision-making is impacting new vehicle sales at a certain level, he noted."Expediting clarity on GST rates is essential to get back to speed and ensure the auto sector's contribution to economic growth during this quarter is robust," Brar stated.He also hoped that the sustainable p...

Sebi proposes tighter norms for green bond third-party reviewers

  Sebi on Friday said it has proposed to tighten the norms to appoint independent third-party reviewers or certifiers for green debt securities to align them with requirements for other ESG-linked bonds.In a draft circular, Sebi said that the current norms for green bonds, introduced in February 2023, lack detailed requirements around reviewer independence, conflict of interest mitigation, and disclosure standards that are now in place for other ESG-linked securities under a June 2025 circular.The regulator's latest proposal seeks public comments on a revised framework that would bring parity by incorporating comprehensive criteria for third-party certifiers of green bonds on non-convertible securities.Under the proposed norms, issuers of green debt securities will need to appoint reviewers who are independent of their management, directors, and key managerial personnel. These reviewers will be remunerated in a way that prevents any conflicts of interest and possess relevant expert...