Skip to main content

Govt to withdraw 7,500 small indirect tax cases

The government has identified 7,500 cases related to service tax and Customs it plans to withdraw from tribunals and high courts.
These cases are where the disputed tax is below the threshold set in December at Rs 10 lakh for the Customs Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) and Rs 15 lakh for high courts.
The Central Board of Excise and Customs (CBEC) has started filing applications with the tribunals and high courts seeking withdrawal of the cases. The step was taken to make the tax regime non-adversarial, with a focus on quality rather than meeting collection targets, officials said.
"We have begun the process of withdrawing cases. We have identified approximately 7,500 cases in the CESTAT and the high courts. Now, it is up to the judicial bodies to allow the withdrawal," said an official.
The CESTAT is an independent appeals forum against orders passed by commissioners of customs and excise relating to service tax, customs and central excise.
The department, however, is not seeking withdrawal of cases from the Supreme Court. "We are not touching the Supreme Court because cases at that level are few and most relate to matters of law," the official added. The move is expected to clear the litigation backlog. Already, about 75 per cent of cases are settled in favour of taxpayers.
"The move will help reduce congestion at tribunals and high courts. But the answer lies in increasing the number of benches and having more members," said Saloni Roy, a senior partner at Deloitte.
The CBEC is also periodically instructing tax officials to issue notices based on merit alone."We are sensitising the staff that notices should be strictly according to the law. We are training them on how to issue legally sound notices and orders. We have also withdrawn the vigilance order that caused fear among tax officials. Now they can decide cases on merit," another official said.
The CBEC has instructed zonal chief commissioners and principal commissioners to hold monthly or bi-monthly meetings with all the adjudicating and appellate authorities in their zones and advise them on how to pass orders.
Besides, training is being imparted on the qualities of a good adjudication order, advocacy, interpretation of statutes as well as drafting of laws.
Pre-notice consultation at the level of principal commissioner and commissioner has been made mandatory in all cases where the tax involved is above Rs 50 lakh.
The government has also come out with a new appraisal system for tax officials in which the focus will be on the quality of orders issued. The move is aimed at discouraging taxmen from issuing frivolous tax demands.
The performance of assessing officers will also be measured for quality of assessment, pace of disposal, and efforts made towards widening the tax base rather than meeting the annual collection targets.
EASING OUT
As many as 136,365 indirect tax dispute cases are pending before CESTAT, Commissioner (Appeal), high courts and the Supreme Court at the end of Sept 2015These cases have a financial implication of Rs 2,11,881 crore as on September 2015
To reduce litigation, CBEC decides to withdraw cases with disputed amount of less than Rs 10 lakh in CESTAT and Rs 15 lakh in high courts
It has identified about 7,500 cases to be withdrawn from CESTAT and high courts
But, no plan to withdraw cases from the Supreme Court
There is also a new appraisal system for tax officials in place, which discourages them to issue frivolous tax notices
Business Standard New Delhi,20th April 2016

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Govt’s gamble on GST cuts: What do the bond and currency markets signal?

  It’s not just humans who suffer from cognitive biases; markets do too. Interestingly, different financial markets exhibit distinct biases, each interpreting events through its own prism of prejudice. Take the recent announcements on GST reforms: equity markets have chosen to view them through the lens of growth, while bond and currency markets are focusing on potential macroeconomic risks—fiscal pressures and current account challenges. So, which lens captures the true pulse?Equity markets may be right in expecting GST reforms to revive consumption, which has remained lacklustre for a while. But the key question remains—will this revival come at the cost of broader macro stability?It is well known that consumption stocks have rallied since the GST rationalisation announcement. But what about bond markets? What signals are they sending since this rejig was announced from the ramparts of the Red Fort?The signs aren't encouraging. Bond prices have slumped and yields have surged sinc...

Luxury carmakers urge clarity on GST rates to boost festive season sales

  A clear picture regarding new GST rates at the earliest will help the overall auto industry, including the luxury car segment, to regain momentum in the ongoing quarter, which generally sees enhanced sales on account of the festive season.The high-powered GST Council, chaired by Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman, will meet on September 3-4 to discuss moving to a two-slab taxation.In an interaction with PTI, BMW Group India President and CEO Hardeep Singh Brar said the recent speculation about the change in GST rates has caused uncertainty in the minds of consumers.Consumer interest and demand is strong, but they (prospective buyers) have adopted a wait-and-watch approach, and this delayed decision-making is impacting new vehicle sales at a certain level, he noted."Expediting clarity on GST rates is essential to get back to speed and ensure the auto sector's contribution to economic growth during this quarter is robust," Brar stated.He also hoped that the sustainable p...

Sebi proposes tighter norms for green bond third-party reviewers

  Sebi on Friday said it has proposed to tighten the norms to appoint independent third-party reviewers or certifiers for green debt securities to align them with requirements for other ESG-linked bonds.In a draft circular, Sebi said that the current norms for green bonds, introduced in February 2023, lack detailed requirements around reviewer independence, conflict of interest mitigation, and disclosure standards that are now in place for other ESG-linked securities under a June 2025 circular.The regulator's latest proposal seeks public comments on a revised framework that would bring parity by incorporating comprehensive criteria for third-party certifiers of green bonds on non-convertible securities.Under the proposed norms, issuers of green debt securities will need to appoint reviewers who are independent of their management, directors, and key managerial personnel. These reviewers will be remunerated in a way that prevents any conflicts of interest and possess relevant expert...