Conflicting Orders by Sebi Draw SAT Ire

CRITICISES MARKET REGULATOR for passing conflicting orders on similar securities law violations
The Securities Appellate Tribunal took the capital market regulator to task for passing conflicting orders on similar securities law violations. In an unusually strong rebuke to the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi), the tribunal said the regulator was “blindly supporting“ adjudicating officers, terming its conduct in a case as “disgraceful.“

The Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT) was hearing the case between Sebi on the one side and Krishna Enterprises and Rajesh Service Centre on the other. The entities had appealed to SAT against Sebi fining them `20 lakh on two securities law violation charges each. The regulator had alleged that the two entities aided Edserve Softsystems in siphoning off proceeds from its initial public offer, thereby causing loss to shareholders.

SAT observed that Sebi had charged the entities with two separate violations and accordingly imposed two separate penalties in the order posted on its website on Friday .

In another case -Kejas Parmar versus Sebi -similar to this one, the regulator had applied provisions relating to two violations together and not separately . This led to the regulator imposing a common penalty .

SAT was irked by Sebi's lawyer saying that the regulator stood by both its decisions. “We are surprised by the attitude adopted by Sebi,“ said the three-member SAT bench headed by Justice JP Devadhar.

Passing conflicting orders and defending them doesn't “promote the development of the securities market,“ it said. “The conduct of Sebi in supporting the orders passed by its adjudicating officers which are mutually contradictory in nature and give leverage to the officers to impose penalty as it suits them, clearly shows that Sebi is blindly supporting the orders passed by its officers in spite of the fact that the said orders are detrimental to the interests of the securities market. Such a conduct on part of Sebi is disgraceful to say the least,“ the bench said.

SAT quashed the regulator's order and sent the case back to the adjudicating officer.

Securities lawyers cited the ruling to call for a change in laws. “A strong securities tribunal is the only counter balance to a strong regulator like Sebi,“ said Manshoor Nazki of Luthra & Luthra Law Offices.“This recent order is an example of the very important role that SAT has to play to ensure that a regulator like Sebi is kept in check while passing penalty orders.“

The entire mechanism needs to be reviewed so that adjudicating offic ers pass orders that are consistent, said Sandeep Parekh, founder, Finsec Law Advisors and a former Sebi executive director.

“Similar quantum of penalty should be imposed for similar offences,“ said Parekh. “ Adjudicating officers are considered independent within Sebi and there is in fact no interference with their working. It is this independent working which causes different outcomes in different places.“

Bombay High Court advocate Vaneesa Agrawal agreed. “Without the in-house coordination between various adjudicating officers, these issues are likely to continue. However, Sebi can make its policy view commonly known to all the adjudicating officers to bring uniformity in their orders. In that respect, SAT's order is a good guidance.

The Economic Times New Delhi,25th April 2016

RBI deputy governor cautions fintech platform lenders on privacy concerns during loan recovery

India's digital lending infrastructure has made the loan sanctioning system online. Yet, loan recovery still needs a “feet on the street” approach, Swaminathan J, deputy governor of the Reserve Bank of India, said at a media event on Tuesday, September 2, according to news agency ANI.According to the ANI report, the deputy governor flagged that fintech operators in the digital lending segment are giving out loans to customers with poor credit profiles and later using aggressive recovery tactics.“While loan sanctioning and disbursement have become increasingly digital, effective collection and recovery still require a 'feet on the street' and empathetic approach. Many fintech platforms operate on a business model that involves extending small-value loans to customers often with poor credit profiles,” Swaminathan J said. Fintech platforms' business models The central bank deputy governor highlighted that many fintech platforms' business models involve providing sm

Credit card spending growth declines on RBI gaze, stress build-up

Credit card spends have further slowed down to 16.6 per cent in the current financial year (FY25), following the Reserve Bank of India’s tightening of unsecured lending norms and rising delinquencies, and increased stress in the portfolio.Typically, during the festival season (September–December), credit card spends peak as several credit card-issuing banks offer discounts and cashbacks on e-commerce and other platforms. This is a reversal of trend in the past three financial years stretching to FY21 due to RBI’s restrictions.In the previous financial year (FY24), credit card spends rose by 27.8 per cent, but were low compared to FY23 which surged by 47.5 per cent. In FY22, the spending increased 54.1 per cent, according to data compiled by Macquarie Research.ICICI Bank recorded 4.4 per cent gross credit losses in its FY24 credit card portfolio as against 3.2 per cent year-on-year. SBI Cards’ credit losses in the segment stood at 7.4 per cent in FY24 and 6.2 per cent in FY23, the rep

India can't rely on wealthy to drive growth: Ex-RBI Dy Guv Viral Acharya

India can’t rely on wealthy individuals to drive growth and expect the overall economy to improve, Viral Acharya, former deputy governor of the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) said on Monday.Acharya, who is the C V Starr Professor of Economics in the Department of Finance at New York University’s Stern School of Business (NYU-Stern), said after the Covid-19 pandemic, rural consumption and investments have weakened.We can’t be pumping our growth through the rich and expect that the economy as a whole will do better,” he said while speaking at an event organised by Elara Capital here.f there has to be a trickle-down, it should have actually happened by now,” Acharya said, adding that when the rich keep getting wealthier and wealthier, they have a savings problem. “The bank account keeps getting bigger, hence they look for financial assets to invest in. India is closed, so our money can't go outside India that easily. So, it has to chase the limited financial assets in the country and

CA Online

Search This Blog