Skip to main content

6% Equalisation Levy will Cripple Startup Firms

Levy will raise co's tax obligations by almost 50%

The proposed 6% equalisation levy on the online advertisement revenue of foreign companies introduced in the Finance Bill 2016 will “cripple the startup companies“ and raise their tax obligations by almost 50%, the Internet and Mobile Association of India (IAMAI) has said.

The industry body said that the levy will have a severe impact on Indian technology startups and small and medium enterprises (SMEs), which it said are primary users of digital ad platforms such as Google and Facebook.

An eight-member committee on taxation of ecommerce had in a report, released last month, proposed that services ranging from online advertising and cloud computing to software downloads and web hosting be subject to an “equalisation levy“ of 6-8% of gross payment if the provider of the service is a foreign entity without a “permanent establishment“ in India.

“The tech startups are already paying 14.5% service tax to use these ad platforms which amounts to an estimated Rs 906 crore of taxes to the government,“ the association said in a statement on Thursday.

The levy was initially understood to be a way for the government to get foreign internet companies to pay taxes. However, because of the nature of the levy, the companies will not be eligible for credits in their home countries, which means the levy will have to be paid by users of their advertising platforms, such as startups and SMEs.

With the implementation of GST (Goods and Services Tax), the tax rate is likely to move to 18%, bringing more taxes to the government from this segment, the association said. “Considering the incidence of 6% levy will be passed on to the advertisers by the ad platforms, the total burden to SMEs and tech startups on account of equalisation levy on international advertising platforms would be Rs.429 crore, a massive hike of nearly 50%,“ the statement said.

The industry body, which includes members such as Google, Microsoft, LinkedIn, Facebook and Twitter, said it was opposed to dif ferential pricing, as it violates net neutrality.

ET had earlier reported that while the intention of the government was to tax online companies, the levy could actually end up being a cost to small Indian businesses which advertise on these platforms.

“Prima facie it looks impractical and unreasonable, that to collect additional revenues of Rs.400 crore, the government is ready to hurt the startups. This is actually a tax on Indian startups,“ IAMAI president Subho Ray said.

The association took a strong stand against the implementation of the levy. “India will stand out like a sore thumb if the government doesn't withdraw this proposal,“ Ray said.

The issue, for long, has been that multinational companies such as Google, Facebook and Twitter -not to be confused with their Indian arms -do not have “permanent establishments“ in India which would make them liable to pay tax.

The Economic Times, New Delhi, 29 April 2016

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

RBI deputy governor cautions fintech platform lenders on privacy concerns during loan recovery

  India's digital lending infrastructure has made the loan sanctioning system online. Yet, loan recovery still needs a “feet on the street” approach, Swaminathan J, deputy governor of the Reserve Bank of India, said at a media event on Tuesday, September 2, according to news agency ANI.According to the ANI report, the deputy governor flagged that fintech operators in the digital lending segment are giving out loans to customers with poor credit profiles and later using aggressive recovery tactics.“While loan sanctioning and disbursement have become increasingly digital, effective collection and recovery still require a 'feet on the street' and empathetic approach. Many fintech platforms operate on a business model that involves extending small-value loans to customers often with poor credit profiles,” Swaminathan J said.   Fintech platforms' business models The central bank deputy governor highlighted that many fintech platforms' business models involve providing sm

Credit card spending growth declines on RBI gaze, stress build-up

  Credit card spends have further slowed down to 16.6 per cent in the current financial year (FY25), following the Reserve Bank of India’s tightening of unsecured lending norms and rising delinquencies, and increased stress in the portfolio.Typically, during the festival season (September–December), credit card spends peak as several credit card-issuing banks offer discounts and cashbacks on e-commerce and other platforms. This is a reversal of trend in the past three financial years stretching to FY21 due to RBI’s restrictions.In the previous financial year (FY24), credit card spends rose by 27.8 per cent, but were low compared to FY23 which surged by 47.5 per cent. In FY22, the spending increased 54.1 per cent, according to data compiled by Macquarie Research.ICICI Bank recorded 4.4 per cent gross credit losses in its FY24 credit card portfolio as against 3.2 per cent year-on-year. SBI Cards’ credit losses in the segment stood at 7.4 per cent in FY24 and 6.2 per cent in FY23, the rep

India can't rely on wealthy to drive growth: Ex-RBI Dy Guv Viral Acharya

  India can’t rely on wealthy individuals to drive growth and expect the overall economy to improve, Viral Acharya, former deputy governor of the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) said on Monday.Acharya, who is the C V Starr Professor of Economics in the Department of Finance at New York University’s Stern School of Business (NYU-Stern), said after the Covid-19 pandemic, rural consumption and investments have weakened.We can’t be pumping our growth through the rich and expect that the economy as a whole will do better,” he said while speaking at an event organised by Elara Capital here.f there has to be a trickle-down, it should have actually happened by now,” Acharya said, adding that when the rich keep getting wealthier and wealthier, they have a savings problem.   “The bank account keeps getting bigger, hence they look for financial assets to invest in. India is closed, so our money can't go outside India that easily. So, it has to chase the limited financial assets in the country and