Skip to main content

6% Equalisation Levy will Cripple Startup Firms

Levy will raise co's tax obligations by almost 50%

The proposed 6% equalisation levy on the online advertisement revenue of foreign companies introduced in the Finance Bill 2016 will “cripple the startup companies“ and raise their tax obligations by almost 50%, the Internet and Mobile Association of India (IAMAI) has said.

The industry body said that the levy will have a severe impact on Indian technology startups and small and medium enterprises (SMEs), which it said are primary users of digital ad platforms such as Google and Facebook.

An eight-member committee on taxation of ecommerce had in a report, released last month, proposed that services ranging from online advertising and cloud computing to software downloads and web hosting be subject to an “equalisation levy“ of 6-8% of gross payment if the provider of the service is a foreign entity without a “permanent establishment“ in India.

“The tech startups are already paying 14.5% service tax to use these ad platforms which amounts to an estimated Rs 906 crore of taxes to the government,“ the association said in a statement on Thursday.

The levy was initially understood to be a way for the government to get foreign internet companies to pay taxes. However, because of the nature of the levy, the companies will not be eligible for credits in their home countries, which means the levy will have to be paid by users of their advertising platforms, such as startups and SMEs.

With the implementation of GST (Goods and Services Tax), the tax rate is likely to move to 18%, bringing more taxes to the government from this segment, the association said. “Considering the incidence of 6% levy will be passed on to the advertisers by the ad platforms, the total burden to SMEs and tech startups on account of equalisation levy on international advertising platforms would be Rs.429 crore, a massive hike of nearly 50%,“ the statement said.

The industry body, which includes members such as Google, Microsoft, LinkedIn, Facebook and Twitter, said it was opposed to dif ferential pricing, as it violates net neutrality.

ET had earlier reported that while the intention of the government was to tax online companies, the levy could actually end up being a cost to small Indian businesses which advertise on these platforms.

“Prima facie it looks impractical and unreasonable, that to collect additional revenues of Rs.400 crore, the government is ready to hurt the startups. This is actually a tax on Indian startups,“ IAMAI president Subho Ray said.

The association took a strong stand against the implementation of the levy. “India will stand out like a sore thumb if the government doesn't withdraw this proposal,“ Ray said.

The issue, for long, has been that multinational companies such as Google, Facebook and Twitter -not to be confused with their Indian arms -do not have “permanent establishments“ in India which would make them liable to pay tax.

The Economic Times, New Delhi, 29 April 2016

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Govt’s gamble on GST cuts: What do the bond and currency markets signal?

  It’s not just humans who suffer from cognitive biases; markets do too. Interestingly, different financial markets exhibit distinct biases, each interpreting events through its own prism of prejudice. Take the recent announcements on GST reforms: equity markets have chosen to view them through the lens of growth, while bond and currency markets are focusing on potential macroeconomic risks—fiscal pressures and current account challenges. So, which lens captures the true pulse?Equity markets may be right in expecting GST reforms to revive consumption, which has remained lacklustre for a while. But the key question remains—will this revival come at the cost of broader macro stability?It is well known that consumption stocks have rallied since the GST rationalisation announcement. But what about bond markets? What signals are they sending since this rejig was announced from the ramparts of the Red Fort?The signs aren't encouraging. Bond prices have slumped and yields have surged sinc...

Luxury carmakers urge clarity on GST rates to boost festive season sales

  A clear picture regarding new GST rates at the earliest will help the overall auto industry, including the luxury car segment, to regain momentum in the ongoing quarter, which generally sees enhanced sales on account of the festive season.The high-powered GST Council, chaired by Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman, will meet on September 3-4 to discuss moving to a two-slab taxation.In an interaction with PTI, BMW Group India President and CEO Hardeep Singh Brar said the recent speculation about the change in GST rates has caused uncertainty in the minds of consumers.Consumer interest and demand is strong, but they (prospective buyers) have adopted a wait-and-watch approach, and this delayed decision-making is impacting new vehicle sales at a certain level, he noted."Expediting clarity on GST rates is essential to get back to speed and ensure the auto sector's contribution to economic growth during this quarter is robust," Brar stated.He also hoped that the sustainable p...

Sebi proposes tighter norms for green bond third-party reviewers

  Sebi on Friday said it has proposed to tighten the norms to appoint independent third-party reviewers or certifiers for green debt securities to align them with requirements for other ESG-linked bonds.In a draft circular, Sebi said that the current norms for green bonds, introduced in February 2023, lack detailed requirements around reviewer independence, conflict of interest mitigation, and disclosure standards that are now in place for other ESG-linked securities under a June 2025 circular.The regulator's latest proposal seeks public comments on a revised framework that would bring parity by incorporating comprehensive criteria for third-party certifiers of green bonds on non-convertible securities.Under the proposed norms, issuers of green debt securities will need to appoint reviewers who are independent of their management, directors, and key managerial personnel. These reviewers will be remunerated in a way that prevents any conflicts of interest and possess relevant expert...