Skip to main content

Govt buries EPF tax

By
FM retains tax exemption for National Pension System
Just over a week after the announcement, Finance Minister Arun Jaitley on Tuesday rolled back his controversial Budget proposal to tax Employees’ Provident Fund ( EPF) withdrawal. The Budget had announced that 40 per cent of the total corpus withdrawn from the EPF would be tax- exempt and the balance 60 per cent would be taxable unless the amount is used to buy an annuity product. Jaitley also took back his earlier proposal to tax contribution made by an employer beyond Rs.1.5 lakh a year to EPF. Both the proposals had drawn strong protest from the Opposition, trade unions and the salaried class.
Jaitley, however, retained a proposal not to tax 40 per cent of money withdrawn from National Pension System( NPS). This means that only balance 60 per cent would be taxed against the current practice of taxing the entire amount withdrawn from NPS.
Making a suo motu statement in the Lok Sabha on the issue, Jaitley said, “ In view of the representations received, the government would like to do comprehensive review of this proposal and therefore I withdraw the proposals in paragraph 138 and 139 of my Budget speech. The proposal of 40 per cent exemption given to NPS subscribers at the time of withdrawal remains.” Paragraph 138 proposed to tax money withdrawn from EPF beyond 40 per cent, if the sum is not invested in annuity. Paragraph 139 proposed to tax contribution made by an employer exceeding Rs.1.50 lakh in EPF a year. Both the proposals were to come into effect from April 1, 2016.
After this, no amount withdrawn from EPF account would be taxed, whether it is invested in annuity or not. In other words, the present situation continues. The FM did not alter paragraph 137 of the speech which proposed not to tax 40 per cent of the corpus withdrawn from NPS at the time of retirement.
Jaitley had earlier indicated that he would address the concerns on retirement tax when he replies to the debate on Budget 2016- 17 in Parliament, which would start from Wednesday in the Lok Sabha.
The Budget proposals on EPF tax drew flak from both employee unions and political parties who said the government was taxing employees at the fag- end of their career, when they needed money the most.
“The government has been forced to roll it back under continuous pressure from the unions,” said A K Padmanabhan, president of Centre of Indian Trade Unions ( CITU) and a board member of EPF Organisation.
The government had justified the move saying the attempt was to create a pensioned society.
Just over a week after the announcement, Finance Minister Arun Jaitley on Tuesday rolled back his controversial Budget proposal to tax Employees’ Provident Fund ( EPF) withdrawal. The Budget had announced that 40 per cent of the total corpus withdrawn from the EPF would be tax- exempt and the balance 60 per cent would be taxable unless the amount is used to buy an annuity product. Jaitley also took back his earlier proposal to tax contribution made by an employer beyond ? 1.5 lakh a year to EPF. Both the proposals had drawn strong protest from the Opposition, trade unions and the salaried class.
Jaitley, however, retained a proposal not to tax 40 per cent of money withdrawn from National Pension System( NPS). This means that only balance 60 per cent would be taxed against the current practice of taxing the entire amount withdrawn from NPS.
Making a suo motu statement in the Lok Sabha on the issue, Jaitley said, “ In view of the representations received, the government would like to do comprehensive review of this proposal and therefore I withdraw the proposals in paragraph 138 and 139 of my Budget speech. The proposal of 40 per cent exemption given to NPS subscribers at the time of withdrawal remains.” Paragraph 138 proposed to tax money withdrawn from EPF beyond 40 per cent, if the sum is not invested in annuity. Paragraph 139 proposed to tax contribution made by an employer exceeding Rs.1.50 lakh in EPF a year. Both the proposals were to come into effect from April 1, 2016.
After this, no amount withdrawn from EPF account would be taxed, whether it is invested in annuity or not. In other words, the present situation continues. The FM did not alter paragraph 137 of the speech which proposed not to tax 40 per cent of the corpus withdrawn from NPS at the time of retirement.
Jaitley had earlier indicated that he would address the concerns on retirement tax when he replies to the debate on Budget 2016- 17 in Parliament, which would start from Wednesday in the Lok Sabha.
The Budget proposals on EPF tax drew flak from both employee unions and political parties who said the government was taxing employees at the fag- end of their career, when they needed money the most.
“The government has been forced to roll it back under continuous pressure from the unions,” said A K Padmanabhan, president of Centre of Indian Trade Unions ( CITU) and a board member of EPF Organisation.
The government had justified the move saying the attempt was to create a pensioned society.
CENTRE’S PREVIOUS FLIP- FLOPS:
Finance Minister Arun Jaitley’s withdrawal of Budget proposal to levy tax on Employees Provident Fund ( EPF) withdrawals is one of several occasions in past 21 months when the Centre has reconsidered its position:
MGNREGA: Inone of his early speeches in the Lok Sabha, PM Narendra Modi had trashed it as a living monument to Congress’ failures. In this Budget, the government has allocated highest- ever funds for the scheme

Aadhaar Bill: BJP had rejected UPA’s National Identification Authority of India Bill, 2010. However, the govt is now pushing for a Money Bill, which is almost identical
Land Bill: Centre issued ordinances and vowed to amend UPA’s 2013 Land Bill to make it pro- industry. The Bill is now slated to be withdrawn
MAT: Rolled back past cases of Minimum Alternate Taxon foreign portfolio investors
ITR forms: Government had to drop new Income- Tax Return forms introduced in March  2015 after being criticised for seeking details like foreign travels and dormant bank accounts
Insurance Laws(Amendment) Bill: BJP had blocked the Insurance Bill during UPA rule. Once in power, it ensured passage of the Bill in both Houses
Internet porn ban: Last August, Centre moved to block access to 850 pornographic websites. However, after criticism, itrestricted the ban to child pornography

Business Standard, New Delhi, 9th March 2016

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Data storage norm splits digital payments industry

By
Data storage norm splits digital payments industry  India’s nascent digital payment industry could be thrown into disarray due to the demand by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) that all user data be stored within the country, fears an industry grouping, which has termed the decision as “heavy-handed”, even as others, including the country’s largest digital payment provider Paytm, have hailed the move.  In a bid to narrow the growing schism, the industry is planning to send a formal representation to the regulator highlighting its concerns, a top official told ET.  “We are trying to build a consensus on the issue," said the person adding that the representation to the central bank will be ready this week.  RBI on April 6, mandated all payment companies—global and local—to set up data storage facilities within India by October. The stringent six-month deadline has attracted the ire of several sections of the industry that fear it will lead to a disruption of wel...
18 comments
Read more

Sebi to finalise options in commodities today

By
The Commodity Derivatives Advisory Committee of the Securities and Exchange Board of India ( Sebi) will meet on Friday with senior officials of the latter, to give a final shape to the rules on options trading in commodity futures, beside revising the warehousing norms to ensure good delivery on settlement. The decision taken, after discussing with the advisory committee, will be placed before the regulator’s board, to finalise the regulations. According to knowledgeable sources, three commodities in each segment, agricultural and non- agricultural, have been proposed for introducing options. It appears commodities from the soya and guar segments are preferred in the former. From the non- agri segment, it is likely that gold, silver and crude oil will be finalised. All these These have better liquidity and both the National Commodity and Derivatives Exchange and the Multi Commodity Exchange, respectively, will be able to introduce the options. In the equity segments, options ar...
17 comments
Read more

E tailers global warehouses may come under tax net

By
E tailers  global warehouses may come under tax net Warehouses of e-commerce companies based in countries such as Australia, Japan, Italy,  Spain, the Netherlands, and Russia may not be exempted from paying the income tax in India  once the multilateral instrument (MLI) to prevent base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS)  comes into force. BEPS refers to the reporting framework mooted by the Organisation for Economic  Co-operation and Development (OECD) and signed by over 100 countries, including India, to  prevent exploiting gaps and mismatches in tax rules to shift profits by multinational  companies (MNCs) artificially to low-tax regimes. The representatives of 68 countries on June 7 this year signed an agreement (MLI) in Paris  to amend their tax treaties to bring them in alignment with measures to prevent BEPS.  However, there is still time for synchronising tax treaties with the multilateral  instrument. India has submitte...
17 comments
Read more