Skip to main content

Govt buries EPF tax

By
FM retains tax exemption for National Pension System
Just over a week after the announcement, Finance Minister Arun Jaitley on Tuesday rolled back his controversial Budget proposal to tax Employees’ Provident Fund ( EPF) withdrawal. The Budget had announced that 40 per cent of the total corpus withdrawn from the EPF would be tax- exempt and the balance 60 per cent would be taxable unless the amount is used to buy an annuity product. Jaitley also took back his earlier proposal to tax contribution made by an employer beyond Rs.1.5 lakh a year to EPF. Both the proposals had drawn strong protest from the Opposition, trade unions and the salaried class.
Jaitley, however, retained a proposal not to tax 40 per cent of money withdrawn from National Pension System( NPS). This means that only balance 60 per cent would be taxed against the current practice of taxing the entire amount withdrawn from NPS.
Making a suo motu statement in the Lok Sabha on the issue, Jaitley said, “ In view of the representations received, the government would like to do comprehensive review of this proposal and therefore I withdraw the proposals in paragraph 138 and 139 of my Budget speech. The proposal of 40 per cent exemption given to NPS subscribers at the time of withdrawal remains.” Paragraph 138 proposed to tax money withdrawn from EPF beyond 40 per cent, if the sum is not invested in annuity. Paragraph 139 proposed to tax contribution made by an employer exceeding Rs.1.50 lakh in EPF a year. Both the proposals were to come into effect from April 1, 2016.
After this, no amount withdrawn from EPF account would be taxed, whether it is invested in annuity or not. In other words, the present situation continues. The FM did not alter paragraph 137 of the speech which proposed not to tax 40 per cent of the corpus withdrawn from NPS at the time of retirement.
Jaitley had earlier indicated that he would address the concerns on retirement tax when he replies to the debate on Budget 2016- 17 in Parliament, which would start from Wednesday in the Lok Sabha.
The Budget proposals on EPF tax drew flak from both employee unions and political parties who said the government was taxing employees at the fag- end of their career, when they needed money the most.
“The government has been forced to roll it back under continuous pressure from the unions,” said A K Padmanabhan, president of Centre of Indian Trade Unions ( CITU) and a board member of EPF Organisation.
The government had justified the move saying the attempt was to create a pensioned society.
Just over a week after the announcement, Finance Minister Arun Jaitley on Tuesday rolled back his controversial Budget proposal to tax Employees’ Provident Fund ( EPF) withdrawal. The Budget had announced that 40 per cent of the total corpus withdrawn from the EPF would be tax- exempt and the balance 60 per cent would be taxable unless the amount is used to buy an annuity product. Jaitley also took back his earlier proposal to tax contribution made by an employer beyond ? 1.5 lakh a year to EPF. Both the proposals had drawn strong protest from the Opposition, trade unions and the salaried class.
Jaitley, however, retained a proposal not to tax 40 per cent of money withdrawn from National Pension System( NPS). This means that only balance 60 per cent would be taxed against the current practice of taxing the entire amount withdrawn from NPS.
Making a suo motu statement in the Lok Sabha on the issue, Jaitley said, “ In view of the representations received, the government would like to do comprehensive review of this proposal and therefore I withdraw the proposals in paragraph 138 and 139 of my Budget speech. The proposal of 40 per cent exemption given to NPS subscribers at the time of withdrawal remains.” Paragraph 138 proposed to tax money withdrawn from EPF beyond 40 per cent, if the sum is not invested in annuity. Paragraph 139 proposed to tax contribution made by an employer exceeding Rs.1.50 lakh in EPF a year. Both the proposals were to come into effect from April 1, 2016.
After this, no amount withdrawn from EPF account would be taxed, whether it is invested in annuity or not. In other words, the present situation continues. The FM did not alter paragraph 137 of the speech which proposed not to tax 40 per cent of the corpus withdrawn from NPS at the time of retirement.
Jaitley had earlier indicated that he would address the concerns on retirement tax when he replies to the debate on Budget 2016- 17 in Parliament, which would start from Wednesday in the Lok Sabha.
The Budget proposals on EPF tax drew flak from both employee unions and political parties who said the government was taxing employees at the fag- end of their career, when they needed money the most.
“The government has been forced to roll it back under continuous pressure from the unions,” said A K Padmanabhan, president of Centre of Indian Trade Unions ( CITU) and a board member of EPF Organisation.
The government had justified the move saying the attempt was to create a pensioned society.
CENTRE’S PREVIOUS FLIP- FLOPS:
Finance Minister Arun Jaitley’s withdrawal of Budget proposal to levy tax on Employees Provident Fund ( EPF) withdrawals is one of several occasions in past 21 months when the Centre has reconsidered its position:
MGNREGA: Inone of his early speeches in the Lok Sabha, PM Narendra Modi had trashed it as a living monument to Congress’ failures. In this Budget, the government has allocated highest- ever funds for the scheme

Aadhaar Bill: BJP had rejected UPA’s National Identification Authority of India Bill, 2010. However, the govt is now pushing for a Money Bill, which is almost identical
Land Bill: Centre issued ordinances and vowed to amend UPA’s 2013 Land Bill to make it pro- industry. The Bill is now slated to be withdrawn
MAT: Rolled back past cases of Minimum Alternate Taxon foreign portfolio investors
ITR forms: Government had to drop new Income- Tax Return forms introduced in March  2015 after being criticised for seeking details like foreign travels and dormant bank accounts
Insurance Laws(Amendment) Bill: BJP had blocked the Insurance Bill during UPA rule. Once in power, it ensured passage of the Bill in both Houses
Internet porn ban: Last August, Centre moved to block access to 850 pornographic websites. However, after criticism, itrestricted the ban to child pornography

Business Standard, New Delhi, 9th March 2016

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Household debt up, but India still lags emerging-market economies: RBI

By
  Although household debt in India is rising, driven by increased borrowing from the financial sector, it remains lower than in other emerging-market economies (EMEs), the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) said in its Financial Stability Report. It added that non-housing retail loans, largely taken for consumption, accounted for 55 per cent of total household debt.As of December 2024, India’s household debt-to-gross domestic product ratio stood at 41.9 per cent. “...Non-housing retail loans, which are mostly used for consumption purposes, formed 54.9 per cent of total household debt as of March 2025 and 25.7 per cent of disposable income as of March 2024. Moreover, the share of these loans has been growing consistently over the years, and their growth has outpaced that of both housing loans and agriculture and business loans,” the RBI said in its report.Housing loans, by contrast, made up 29 per cent of household debt, and their growth has remained steady. However, disaggregated data sho...
Post a Comment
Read more

External spillovers likely to hit India's financial system: RBI report

By
  While India’s growth remains insulated from global headwinds mainly due to buoyant domestic demand, the domestic financial system could, however, be impacted by external spillovers, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) said in its half yearly Financial Stability Report published on Monday.Furthermore, the rising global trade disputes and intensifying geopolitical hostilities could negatively impact the domestic growth outlook and reduce the demand for bank credit, which has decelerated sharply. “Moreover, it could also lead to increased risk aversion among investors and further corrections in domestic equity markets, which despite the recent correction, remain at the high end of their historical range,” the report said.It noted that there is some build-up of stress, primarily in financial markets, on account of global spillovers, which is reflected in the marginal rise in the financial system stress indicator, an indicator of the stress level in the financial system, compared to its p...
Post a Comment
Read more

Retail inflation cools to a six-year low of 2.82% in May on moderating food prices

By
  New Delhi: Retail inflation in India cooled to its lowest level in over six years in May, helped by a sharp moderation in food prices, according to provisional government data released Thursday.Consumer Price Index (CPI)-based inflation eased to 2.82% year-on-year, down from 3.16% in April and 4.8% in May last year, data from the Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation (MoSPI) showed. This marks the fourth consecutive month of sub-4% inflation, the longest such streak in at least five years.The data comes just days after the Reserve Bank of India’s (RBI) Monetary Policy Committee cut the repo rate by 50 basis points to 5.5%, its third straight cut and a cumulative reduction of 100 basis points since the easing cycle began in February. The move signals a possible pivot from inflation control to supporting growth.Food inflation came in at just 0.99% in May, down from 1.78% in April and a sharp decline from 8.69% a year ago.A Mint poll of 15 economists had projected CPI ...
Post a Comment
Read more