To save promoters from 10% levy, 70 firms call board meetings on interim pay
In the three days since the Union Budget, at least 70 companies have called board meetings to declare interim dividends — in a bid to get the money to the shareholders before the tax on promoters’ dividends kicks in on April 1.
The Budget, presented on Monday, had proposed a 10 per cent tax on the dividends for those promoters with annual dividend income of Rs.10 lakh or more.
Now, about 70 firms — including Bajaj Auto, Sun TV Network, Piramal Enterprises, and Divi’s Laboratories — have called for board meetings to declare interim dividends, payable before April 1. Several of these firms have also fixed a record date.
These 70 firms had collectively paid dividends of about Rs.14,300 crore in FY15.
A similar trend was observed in 2007, after the Union Budget that year proposed raising the DDT to 15 per cent from 12.5 per cent.
Experts said to get a dividend of Rs.10 lakh now, one would have to own a portfolio of Rs.5 crore — assuming a dividend yield of two per cent.
Promoters are likely to prompt their companies to declare higher dividends before April 1.
“Companies where the promoter holding is on the higher side and with the cash in hand will rush to declare dividends this month,” said Sunil Shah, partner, Deloitte Haskins &Sells.
Promoters of top firms are expected to be impacted by the DDT, despite special purpose vehicles ( SPVs) managing their holdings.
According to a Business
Standard report, some of the top promoters who would be hit by this tax — based on their dividend incomes last year — are Wipro Chairman Azim Premji and Reliance Industries Chairman and Managing Director Mukesh Ambani.
“At some stage, when the SPVs pay out dividend to the individual promoter, they would have to shell out this tax,” said Riaz Thingna, director, Grant Thornton Advisory. However, he added, the tax to be paid could be diluted if the SPVs’ dividend payout is funnelled through layers of beneficiaries.
“It’s not yet clear whether or not holding companies receiving dividends from subsidiaries would be subjected to this tax. But, on the whole, this is a retrograde double taxation measure,” said Manishi Raychaudhuri, Asia Pacific strategist, BNP Paribas.
Business Standard, New Delhi, 04 March 2016
In the three days since the Union Budget, at least 70 companies have called board meetings to declare interim dividends — in a bid to get the money to the shareholders before the tax on promoters’ dividends kicks in on April 1.
The Budget, presented on Monday, had proposed a 10 per cent tax on the dividends for those promoters with annual dividend income of Rs.10 lakh or more.
Now, about 70 firms — including Bajaj Auto, Sun TV Network, Piramal Enterprises, and Divi’s Laboratories — have called for board meetings to declare interim dividends, payable before April 1. Several of these firms have also fixed a record date.
These 70 firms had collectively paid dividends of about Rs.14,300 crore in FY15.
A similar trend was observed in 2007, after the Union Budget that year proposed raising the DDT to 15 per cent from 12.5 per cent.
Experts said to get a dividend of Rs.10 lakh now, one would have to own a portfolio of Rs.5 crore — assuming a dividend yield of two per cent.
Promoters are likely to prompt their companies to declare higher dividends before April 1.
“Companies where the promoter holding is on the higher side and with the cash in hand will rush to declare dividends this month,” said Sunil Shah, partner, Deloitte Haskins &Sells.
Promoters of top firms are expected to be impacted by the DDT, despite special purpose vehicles ( SPVs) managing their holdings.
According to a Business
Standard report, some of the top promoters who would be hit by this tax — based on their dividend incomes last year — are Wipro Chairman Azim Premji and Reliance Industries Chairman and Managing Director Mukesh Ambani.
“At some stage, when the SPVs pay out dividend to the individual promoter, they would have to shell out this tax,” said Riaz Thingna, director, Grant Thornton Advisory. However, he added, the tax to be paid could be diluted if the SPVs’ dividend payout is funnelled through layers of beneficiaries.
“It’s not yet clear whether or not holding companies receiving dividends from subsidiaries would be subjected to this tax. But, on the whole, this is a retrograde double taxation measure,” said Manishi Raychaudhuri, Asia Pacific strategist, BNP Paribas.
Business Standard, New Delhi, 04 March 2016
Comments
Post a Comment