Skip to main content

Shareholders Approval Must to Reappoint MDs Above 70

Companies whose managing director, or wholetime director, has crossed the age of 70 will need shareholders' approval for reappointment. The Bombay High Court recently ruled that a managing director and whole-time director who crossed 70 will be automatically disqualified' and companies will have to call a general meeting of shareholders to pass a special resolution enabling them to stay on. More than 120 listed companies will have to approach minority investors in this regard, according to an ET study.
The Bombay High Court in the ruling earlier this month said managing or whole-time directors cannot continue if they have attained the age of 70 years even if they were appointed under the old Act, said experts.
“The Companies Act 2013 was very clear that a MDWTD cannot be appointed or continues after appointment if he has attained an age of 70 years. The confusion was whether this requirement will apply to appointments that were made prior to the Companies Act 2013 coming into force,“ said Dolphy D'Souza, partner in Indian member firm of EY Global.
The case was pertaining to a listed company Ultramarine & Pigments versus Sridhar Sundararajan, an investor. Sundararajan argued that Rangaswamy Sampath who was appointed as the chairman and managing director of the company on August 1, 2012 for a period of 5 ye ars, cannot continue as CMD upon completion of 70 years on 11November 2014.
The single bench of Bombay High Court in November 2015 ruled in favour of the compa ny. However, it was quashed by divisional bench of Bombay High Court on February 8, 2016. Companies will also need to justify the reappointment of these top officials beyond 70 years, as per the Companies Act 2013. Companies, including Auro bindo Pharma, Supreme Indu stries, Jagran Prakashan, Jy othy Laboratories, Gujarat Fluorochemicals, Vardhman Textile and Atul, among others, will soon have to pass a special resolution in this re gard.
MP Taparia, managing direc tor of Supreme Industies; N Srinivasan, MD of India Ce ments; Premchand Godha, CMD of IPCA Lab, and MP Ra machandran, CMD of Jyothy Laboratories and Nimesh Kampani of JM Financial are among the prominent compa ny heads who may need to app roach shareholders. “We shall take such action as may be ne cessary at appropriate time,“ said ML Bansal, company se cretary, Jyothy Laboratories whose chairman and MD MP Ramachandran is in his 70s.
“The provision of section 196 (3)(a) of CA, 2013 applies to those who were appointed as MD or whole-time director before or af ter 1 April 2014. The said provi sion does not permit passing of a special resolution prior to ex piry of the termduring the term, to ensure continuation beyond 70 years,“ said Yogesh Chande, partner, Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas & Co.
Let Them Rock The Boat
Activism is welcome. It will help corporate governance in India to get a boost. An independent director is obliged to look after the interests of all classes of shareholders. In fact, both the Naresh Chandra and the Narayana Murthy panels had envisaged a greater role for independent directors. They should be committed and ready to rock the boat in pursuit of management accountability to shareholders. But in the Indian context, many companies are compelled to fund political parties, but such is funding is kept off the books. This can be resolved only through political reform.
The Economic Times, New Delhi, 29th February 2016

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

RBI deputy governor cautions fintech platform lenders on privacy concerns during loan recovery

  India's digital lending infrastructure has made the loan sanctioning system online. Yet, loan recovery still needs a “feet on the street” approach, Swaminathan J, deputy governor of the Reserve Bank of India, said at a media event on Tuesday, September 2, according to news agency ANI.According to the ANI report, the deputy governor flagged that fintech operators in the digital lending segment are giving out loans to customers with poor credit profiles and later using aggressive recovery tactics.“While loan sanctioning and disbursement have become increasingly digital, effective collection and recovery still require a 'feet on the street' and empathetic approach. Many fintech platforms operate on a business model that involves extending small-value loans to customers often with poor credit profiles,” Swaminathan J said.   Fintech platforms' business models The central bank deputy governor highlighted that many fintech platforms' business models involve providing sm

New income tax slab and rates for new tax regime FY 2023-24 (AY 2024-25) announced in Budget 2023

  Basic exemption limit has been hiked to Rs.3 lakh from Rs 2.5 currently under the new income tax regime in Budget 2023. Further, the income tax slabs in the new tax regime has been changed. According to the announcement, 5 income tax slabs will be there in FY 2023-24, from 6 income tax slabs currently. A rebate under Section 87A has been enhanced under the new tax regime; from the current income level of Rs.5 lakh to Rs.7 lakh. Thus, individuals opting for the new income tax regime and having an income up to Rs.7 lakh will not pay any taxes   The income tax slabs under the new income tax regime will now be as follows: Rs 0 to Rs 3 lakh - 0% tax rate Rs 3 lakh to 6 lakh - 5% Rs 6 lakh to 9 lakh - 10% Rs 9 lakh to Rs 12 lakh - 15% Rs 12 lakh to Rs 15 lakh - 20% Above Rs 15 lakh - 30%   The revised Income tax slabs under new tax regime for FY 2023-24 (AY 2024-25)   Income tax slabs under new tax regime Income tax rates under new tax regime O to Rs 3 lakh 0 Rs 3 lakh to Rs 6 lakh 5% Rs 6

Jaitley plans to cut MSME tax rate to 25%

Income tax for companies with annual turnover up to ?50 crore has been reduced to 25% from 30% in order to make Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (MSME) companies more viable and also to encourage firms to migrate to a company format. This move will benefit 96% or 6.67 lakh of the 6.94 lakh companies filing returns of lower taxation and make MSME sector more competitive as compared with large companies. However, bigger firms have shown their disappointment since the proposal for reducing tax rates was to make Indian firms competitive globally and it is the large firms that are competing globally. The Finance Minister foregone revenue estimate of Rs 7,200 crore per annum for this for this measure. Besides, the Finance Minister refrained from removing or reducing Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT), a popular demand from India Inc., but provided a higher period of 15 years for carry forward of future credit claims, instead of the existing 10-year period. “It is not practical to rem