Skip to main content

Sebi to seek police report before deciding on action against brokers

Capital markets regulator to decide on brokers suspected of selling NSEL contracts as investment vehicles
The capital markets regulator will seek a report from Mumbai police’s economic offences wing (EOW) to decide whether it needs to act against brokers who may have engaged in mis-selling contracts in the National Spot Exchange Ltd (NSEL) scam, two persons familiar with the development said.
After procuring a report from the police wing, the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) will examine whether some brokers indeed violated regulations, the two persons said on condition of anonymity.
Some brokers are suspected to have sold NSEL contracts as investment vehicles. Around 200 brokers are alleged to have sold NSEL products by promising an assured return to investors.
Trading was halted on NSEL in July 2013 after a Rs.5,574 crore settlement scam surfaced at the commodities bourse, which is 99.99% owned by Financial Technologies India Ltd (FTIL). This month, the ministry of corporate affairs (MCA) ordered a merger between FTIL and NSEL
“To initiate action on the allegations against brokers that were selling NSEL contracts, (Sebi) needs additional evidence. To gather this information Sebi will seek a copy of the audit conducted by EOW on these brokers,” said one of the persons cited above.
The regulator will examine the brokers to determine whether they complied with the ‘fit and proper’ criteria ply their trade, the second person said.
In September 2015, the Forward Markets Commission (FMC) was merged with Sebi, bringing the commodity exchanges and participants in the commodity derivatives market under Sebi’s jurisdiction.
Sebi is now trying to streamline rules between the equity markets and commodity markets to ensure continuity of regulations.
As per existing rules for brokers and intermediaries, Sebi assesses brokers and intermediaries to ensure they match the ‘fit and proper’ criteria.
The regulator can take action against an intermediary for violation of Fraud and Unfair Trade Practices Regulations (FUTP) if it finds the conduct of a broker questionable.
The EoW has been investigating the role of brokers in the NSEL scam ever since it came to light in 2013. In March 2015, three brokerage officials were arrested in connection with the scam and later released.
The executives were Amit Rathi, managing director of Anand Rathi Financial Services Ltd; C.P. Krishnan, whole-time director of Geofin Comtrade Ltd; and Chintan Modi, vice-president of India Infoline Commodities Ltd.
Mint reported on 5 March that the three brokerage executives were arrested on charges of cheating, forgery, criminal conspiracy and misappropriation.
Soon after the arrests the three brokerages issued statements saying that they were cooperating with investigating agencies and would continue to do so.
The arrests had followed a forensic audit of brokerages that were trading on NSEL. Business Standard reported on 3 November 2015 that the EOW may conduct a second forensic audit of these brokerages.
“FMC regulations did not have specific guidelines for brokers and were governed by exchange bye-laws. However Sebi has stringent regulations namely FUTP and broker regulations under which it can take action against the registered brokers,” said Parag Bhide, senior associate at the law firm Advaya Legal.

“In this case Sebi may either need to conduct forensic investigation on its own and/or seek reports from agencies like EOW, and Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI),” he said.
Advaya Legal represented Lotus Refineries, named as a defaulting member of NSEL, in the past. It is no longer representing any of the parties involved in the NSEL case.
While Sebi is looking into the role of brokers, it may find it difficult to take action against defaulting members, said another person familiar with Sebi’s processes.
On 12 February, the finance ministry said it had asked Sebi to take action against defaulting NSEL members. A day later, the government issued a final order clearing the merger of NSEL with FTIL. The merger is now subject to the approval of the Bombay high court.
“Sebi has taken cognizance of the finance ministry’s directive to act on the NSEL defaulting members. However, the merger order between Sebi and FMC had kept spot exchanges outside its purview and majority of the defaulting members operate in spot exchange market,” said the person quoted above.
Agreeing with Sebi’s stance, Tejesh Chitlangi, a partner at law firm IC Legal says that Sebi regulations currently do not allow for action against the trading members.
“Sebi doesn’t have jurisdiction over trading members. However, if Sebi wants to act against these members the applicable Section is 11B of Sebi Act under which Sebi has wide ranging powers to act in wider interest of market. It is likely that if Sebi takes action against these members Sebi’s jurisdiction would be challenged,” said Chitlangi.
NSEL, through circulars in September 2013, declared 22 trading members as defaulters for failure to pay their dues.
NSEL investors, however, say that Sebi can take action against defaulting members to recover money under violation of collective investment scheme (CIS) regulations.
“FMC was given the power to recover funds as per the Gazette notification on 6 August 2013, and with the former commodity futures market regulator merged with Sebi, the unified regulator automatically has jurisdiction for search and seizure in this matter to recover funds,” said Ketan Shah, president, NSEL Investors’ Action Group (NIAG).
Through the gazette notification, the government imposed additional conditions on NSEL to protect the interests of commodity market participants.
“Settlement of all outstanding one-day forward contracts at NSEL shall be done under the supervision of FMC and any order or direction issued by the FMC in this regard shall be binding upon the NSEL and any person, intermediary or warehouse connected with the NSEL, and for this purpose, the FMC is authorized to take such measures, as it deems fit,” the notification said.
Ht Mint, New Delhi, 24th February 2016

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

RBI deputy governor cautions fintech platform lenders on privacy concerns during loan recovery

  India's digital lending infrastructure has made the loan sanctioning system online. Yet, loan recovery still needs a “feet on the street” approach, Swaminathan J, deputy governor of the Reserve Bank of India, said at a media event on Tuesday, September 2, according to news agency ANI.According to the ANI report, the deputy governor flagged that fintech operators in the digital lending segment are giving out loans to customers with poor credit profiles and later using aggressive recovery tactics.“While loan sanctioning and disbursement have become increasingly digital, effective collection and recovery still require a 'feet on the street' and empathetic approach. Many fintech platforms operate on a business model that involves extending small-value loans to customers often with poor credit profiles,” Swaminathan J said.   Fintech platforms' business models The central bank deputy governor highlighted that many fintech platforms' business models involve providing sm

Credit card spending growth declines on RBI gaze, stress build-up

  Credit card spends have further slowed down to 16.6 per cent in the current financial year (FY25), following the Reserve Bank of India’s tightening of unsecured lending norms and rising delinquencies, and increased stress in the portfolio.Typically, during the festival season (September–December), credit card spends peak as several credit card-issuing banks offer discounts and cashbacks on e-commerce and other platforms. This is a reversal of trend in the past three financial years stretching to FY21 due to RBI’s restrictions.In the previous financial year (FY24), credit card spends rose by 27.8 per cent, but were low compared to FY23 which surged by 47.5 per cent. In FY22, the spending increased 54.1 per cent, according to data compiled by Macquarie Research.ICICI Bank recorded 4.4 per cent gross credit losses in its FY24 credit card portfolio as against 3.2 per cent year-on-year. SBI Cards’ credit losses in the segment stood at 7.4 per cent in FY24 and 6.2 per cent in FY23, the rep

India can't rely on wealthy to drive growth: Ex-RBI Dy Guv Viral Acharya

  India can’t rely on wealthy individuals to drive growth and expect the overall economy to improve, Viral Acharya, former deputy governor of the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) said on Monday.Acharya, who is the C V Starr Professor of Economics in the Department of Finance at New York University’s Stern School of Business (NYU-Stern), said after the Covid-19 pandemic, rural consumption and investments have weakened.We can’t be pumping our growth through the rich and expect that the economy as a whole will do better,” he said while speaking at an event organised by Elara Capital here.f there has to be a trickle-down, it should have actually happened by now,” Acharya said, adding that when the rich keep getting wealthier and wealthier, they have a savings problem.   “The bank account keeps getting bigger, hence they look for financial assets to invest in. India is closed, so our money can't go outside India that easily. So, it has to chase the limited financial assets in the country and