Skip to main content

Making the company laweasy

By
The Companies Act, 2013, which came into effect from April 2014, has seen scores of changes. Last week, a government- appointed committee proposed another set of 100- odd amendments. Tax and legal experts share with Business Standard their insights on the implications of the committee’s key recommendations
The Companies Act, 2013, which came into effect from April 2014, has seen scores of changes. Last week, a government- appointed committee proposed another set of 100- odd amendments. Tax and legal experts share with Business Standard their insights on the implications of the committee’s key recommendations The proposal to remove government approval for managerial remuneration is in line with international best practices. Seeking government approval for managerial remuneration is alegacy issue and has been a big impediment in ease of doing business. Such approvals took months of paper work and follow ups, leading to uncertainty in the minds of businesses. In effect, the regulator by default was taking business decisions, which should be best left to the judgment of shareholders. Any fears that this move will lead to a spike in remuneration of key managerial personnel should get addressed with the proposal on the need for a special resolution to approve the remuneration along with necessary safeguards in the form of additional disclosures, audits and higher penalties. Having enlightened nonpromoter shareholders is better than apassive regulator taking business decisions.
The proposal is also in favour of start- ups, which need to attract talented individuals to drive their business. Companies that do not have adequate profit - which is the case in most start- ups - need talent to drive their business.
‘Enlightened non- promoter shareholders better than passive regulator’
The proposal to remove government approval for managerial remuneration is in line with international best practices. Seeking government approval for managerial remuneration is alegacy issue and has been a big impediment in ease of doing business. Such approvals took months of paper work and follow ups, leading to uncertainty in the minds of businesses. In effect, the regulator by default was taking business decisions, which should be best left to the judgment of shareholders. Any fears that this move will lead to a spike in remuneration of key managerial personnel should get addressed with the proposal on the need for a special resolution to approve the remuneration along with necessary safeguards in the form of additional disclosures, audits and higher penalties. Having enlightened nonpromoter shareholders is better than apassive regulator taking business decisions.
The proposal is also in favour of start- ups, which need to attract talented individuals to drive their business. Companies that do not have adequate profit - which is the case in most start- ups - need talent to drive their business.
‘Minority shareholders need to be vigilant
Several of the changes suggested by the CLC come with appropriate safeguards, including in some cases further empowering shareholders. But, afew areas will require special attention from minority shareholders:Loans to directors, otherinterested parties: Section 185 currently prohibits such loans, whereas the report recommends that such loans be permitted so long as those are approved by shareholders vide a special resolution and the funds are used for the recipients principal business activities and not further given as loan or investment. Shareholders will, therefore, need to carefully evaluate whether the granting of such loans is in the interest of the company, when exercising their vote. Related partytransactions: The report recommends that no related party be allowed to vote on approval of any related party transactions, even if they are not a party to that transactions, thereby taking away a relaxation that was provided by an MCA circular last year. As a result, more transactions will come their way for approval, where the minority shareholder vote truly counts. Managerial remuneration: It recommends the approval of managerial remuneration be left to the shareholders, with a special resolution being mandated for promoter or related person, and an ordinary resolution for professionals in managerial positions.
‘Inability to make compliance easy is a missed opportunity’
The proposals to allow multilayering of investment companies and remove prohibition on loans to subsidiaries will bring more ease of doing business. Many conglomerates need multi- layer investment structures for genuine reasons such as fund- raising, creating sector specific sub- groups, and private equity investment. Companies will have greater flexibility in raising finance where a PE investor wants to invest in specific businesses or group of entities, instead of making investment at ultimate parent level. There is a marked increase in compliance requirements mandated for private companies under the new Companies Act. There are concerns whether there is a need for increasing so much complexity in firms where the public has no direct financial interest. The Ministry of Corporate Affairs had issued a notification providing marginal relaxations for private companies. Still, there are many requirements in the Act, namely, preparation of consolidated financial statements, internal financial control reporting, rotation of auditors, approval of related party transactions, internal audit, restrictions on giving loans to directors and vigil mechanism, which apply to private companies.
‘No clarity on “ relevant date” to calculate share price’
The Company Law Committee ( CLC) has suggested many recommendations to simplify the process of fundraising without diluting the provisions of law applicable to it. It has recommended reducing paperwork required for raising funds by suggesting filing of e- forms with the registrar of companies ( RoC) be dispensed with. Another recommendation is linking the minimum issue size of private placement to the issue price of shares instead of the face value. It has suggested many provisions of the Companies Act be harmonised with Fema regulations. These include permitting partly paid- up shares as against fully paid- up shares as required under the Companies Act and allowing the use of pricing formula for convertible securities as permitted in Fema regulations, provided the conversion price is not lower than the price prevailing at the time of issue. To curb the practice of using simpler route of rights issue offer to circumvent ‘ preferential offer’, the CLC has recommended that the principles in the English Companies Act should be emulated to decide if the renunciation right has been genuinely exercised or only to bypass the provisions preferential offer. But, it would have been good if the CLC had recommended 180 days to allot shares, as under Fema regulations, instead of within 60 days of receiving the fund.
Business Standard, New Delhi, 8th Feb. 2016

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

RBI deputy governor cautions fintech platform lenders on privacy concerns during loan recovery

By
  India's digital lending infrastructure has made the loan sanctioning system online. Yet, loan recovery still needs a “feet on the street” approach, Swaminathan J, deputy governor of the Reserve Bank of India, said at a media event on Tuesday, September 2, according to news agency ANI.According to the ANI report, the deputy governor flagged that fintech operators in the digital lending segment are giving out loans to customers with poor credit profiles and later using aggressive recovery tactics.“While loan sanctioning and disbursement have become increasingly digital, effective collection and recovery still require a 'feet on the street' and empathetic approach. Many fintech platforms operate on a business model that involves extending small-value loans to customers often with poor credit profiles,” Swaminathan J said.   Fintech platforms' business models The central bank deputy governor highlighted that many fintech platforms' business models involve providing sm
Post a Comment
Read more

Credit card spending growth declines on RBI gaze, stress build-up

By
  Credit card spends have further slowed down to 16.6 per cent in the current financial year (FY25), following the Reserve Bank of India’s tightening of unsecured lending norms and rising delinquencies, and increased stress in the portfolio.Typically, during the festival season (September–December), credit card spends peak as several credit card-issuing banks offer discounts and cashbacks on e-commerce and other platforms. This is a reversal of trend in the past three financial years stretching to FY21 due to RBI’s restrictions.In the previous financial year (FY24), credit card spends rose by 27.8 per cent, but were low compared to FY23 which surged by 47.5 per cent. In FY22, the spending increased 54.1 per cent, according to data compiled by Macquarie Research.ICICI Bank recorded 4.4 per cent gross credit losses in its FY24 credit card portfolio as against 3.2 per cent year-on-year. SBI Cards’ credit losses in the segment stood at 7.4 per cent in FY24 and 6.2 per cent in FY23, the rep
Post a Comment
Read more

India can't rely on wealthy to drive growth: Ex-RBI Dy Guv Viral Acharya

By
  India can’t rely on wealthy individuals to drive growth and expect the overall economy to improve, Viral Acharya, former deputy governor of the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) said on Monday.Acharya, who is the C V Starr Professor of Economics in the Department of Finance at New York University’s Stern School of Business (NYU-Stern), said after the Covid-19 pandemic, rural consumption and investments have weakened.We can’t be pumping our growth through the rich and expect that the economy as a whole will do better,” he said while speaking at an event organised by Elara Capital here.f there has to be a trickle-down, it should have actually happened by now,” Acharya said, adding that when the rich keep getting wealthier and wealthier, they have a savings problem.   “The bank account keeps getting bigger, hence they look for financial assets to invest in. India is closed, so our money can't go outside India that easily. So, it has to chase the limited financial assets in the country and
Post a Comment
Read more