Skip to main content

Investing in IPOs through Asba is convenient saves time

However, you might face some initial hurdles if you have an account with a bank not designated to offer this
Did you face any hurdle while investing in a recent initial public offering ( IPO) stock issue? Did you have to go looking for a bank branch with the Application Supported by Blocked Amount (Asba) facility because your bank did not offer it? Or was your IPO application not processed due to signatures not matching? Or were you advised to invest through a brokerage that is the bank’s subsidiary instead of your regular brokerage? These are some of the initial hurdles a retail investor ( one who invests up to ? 2 lakh) might have faced while investing in IPOs through Asba. However, the process is set to get smoother, say experts.
Asba is an online payment facility provided by some banks, wherein the application money is blocked and gets debited only after IPO allotment is made. It was initially introduced by the Securities and Exchange Board of India ( Sebi) in 2008 and was mandatory for nonretail categories of investors. From January this year, Sebi has also made it mandatory for retail investors.
Asba vs earlier process of applying
Under Asba, investors give the IPO application forms either directly to Self Certified Syndicate Banks ( SCSBs), which then make a bid of the application and block funds. Or investors submit applications to registered brokers or other designated intermediaries which then bid the application and send the form to a SCSB for blocking of funds.
In the earlier process when Asba was not mandatory for retail investors, they could send a cheque/ demand draft with the application form to their brokers. The application was bid by the broker or intermediary member and the money deposited in escrow collection banks for clearance.
“The Asba mechanism, though prevalent for five to six years, has still not become popular with retail investors. In past issues, where retail investors had the option of subscribing through either the Asba or non- Asba mode, only 15- 20 per cent of retail applications came through Asba,’’ says Pranjal Srivastava, senior vice- president at ICICI Securities.
Pluses of Asba
Asba is convenient and reduces the time while applying for IPOs, says Hiren Dhakan, associate fund manager, Bonanza Portfolio. The money gets debited directly from your account. You don’t have to issue a cheque to your broker and wait for it to get cleared. The other advantage is that the investor’s money will continue to earn interest, as funds are in the account, till the time of debit, says Satish Menon, executive director, Geojit BNP Paribas Financial Services. The money is only blocked till you get allotment of shares.
You also don’t have to follow up with your broker for refund of money if you don’t get allotment of shares, as the money remains in your account, Dhakan says.
Likely hurdles
There are hassles, too, at least for now. “ The actual challenge is on the reach and proper submission of IPO forms, as this should be done only in adesignated SCSB,” says Menon. If the investor has a bank account with adesignated one, there is no problem.
The disadvantage is when the investor has a bank account with a non- SCSB bank or a bank without core banking facility. “ In the initial period, investors or their brokers might need to reach out to designated branches in their respective cities or nearby cities for applications, as every bank branch might not accept Asba forms,’’ says Srivastava.
Also, not all bank employees, even of SCSB branches, are aware of the Asba procedure. In such cases, bank staff might refuse to accept IPO forms. Or they might refuse to do the additional work of processing the forms, as it is not part of their routine work, says Dhakan.
Or, in some cities, the volume of applications might not be sufficient for banks to allocate dedicated resources or personnel for Asba, resulting in lack of experience in handling these forms.
In addition, entities accepting an IPO form from an investor should know all details such as the bank account details and send these to the same bank’s SCSB branch. For example, if a broker’s office collects IPO application forms from 20 investors and the accounts are in 15 different banks, these forms will have to be sent to the 15 designated SCSBs (assuming all are eligible).
“This will increase the logistical problems and chances of timeline lapses ( as IPOs are now open for only three days). Hence, the earlier method of submitting IPO forms at the broker’s office might not be efficient and many brokers might be reluctant to take the responsibility of small applications,’’ says Menon.
Investors also need to ensure the requisite funds are available in the account for blocking at the time of making the application, adds Srivastava.
Way ahead
Investors who face difficulty while applying through brokers might do so through their respective banks.
Menon of Geojit BNP Paribas says, “We have a specific set of clientele who used to apply for IPOs through the online method and we are getting queries from them. As of now, we are unable to process their forms due to change of methodology and are asking them to apply through their respective bankers.’’ But, these are only teething problems. “ Sebi has a list of the SCSB branches on its website. Most big public and private banks and even some small co- operative banks are SCSBs,’’ says Dhakan.
Business Standard, New Delhi, 15th Feb. 2016

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Govt’s gamble on GST cuts: What do the bond and currency markets signal?

  It’s not just humans who suffer from cognitive biases; markets do too. Interestingly, different financial markets exhibit distinct biases, each interpreting events through its own prism of prejudice. Take the recent announcements on GST reforms: equity markets have chosen to view them through the lens of growth, while bond and currency markets are focusing on potential macroeconomic risks—fiscal pressures and current account challenges. So, which lens captures the true pulse?Equity markets may be right in expecting GST reforms to revive consumption, which has remained lacklustre for a while. But the key question remains—will this revival come at the cost of broader macro stability?It is well known that consumption stocks have rallied since the GST rationalisation announcement. But what about bond markets? What signals are they sending since this rejig was announced from the ramparts of the Red Fort?The signs aren't encouraging. Bond prices have slumped and yields have surged sinc...

Luxury carmakers urge clarity on GST rates to boost festive season sales

  A clear picture regarding new GST rates at the earliest will help the overall auto industry, including the luxury car segment, to regain momentum in the ongoing quarter, which generally sees enhanced sales on account of the festive season.The high-powered GST Council, chaired by Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman, will meet on September 3-4 to discuss moving to a two-slab taxation.In an interaction with PTI, BMW Group India President and CEO Hardeep Singh Brar said the recent speculation about the change in GST rates has caused uncertainty in the minds of consumers.Consumer interest and demand is strong, but they (prospective buyers) have adopted a wait-and-watch approach, and this delayed decision-making is impacting new vehicle sales at a certain level, he noted."Expediting clarity on GST rates is essential to get back to speed and ensure the auto sector's contribution to economic growth during this quarter is robust," Brar stated.He also hoped that the sustainable p...

Sebi proposes tighter norms for green bond third-party reviewers

  Sebi on Friday said it has proposed to tighten the norms to appoint independent third-party reviewers or certifiers for green debt securities to align them with requirements for other ESG-linked bonds.In a draft circular, Sebi said that the current norms for green bonds, introduced in February 2023, lack detailed requirements around reviewer independence, conflict of interest mitigation, and disclosure standards that are now in place for other ESG-linked securities under a June 2025 circular.The regulator's latest proposal seeks public comments on a revised framework that would bring parity by incorporating comprehensive criteria for third-party certifiers of green bonds on non-convertible securities.Under the proposed norms, issuers of green debt securities will need to appoint reviewers who are independent of their management, directors, and key managerial personnel. These reviewers will be remunerated in a way that prevents any conflicts of interest and possess relevant expert...