Skip to main content

Sebi brings in caveat on stock exchange listing

The recently amended regulations for listing of stock exchanges will bar an entity from trading and being listed on a stock exchange if it holds a 15 per cent stake in it.
According to board minutes released by the Securities and Exchange Board of India ( Sebi), the entity with such a substantial stake would be considered an associate of the exchange.
“Companies which share common directors with that of astock exchange or any of its subsidiaries, or who hold 15 per cent of the equity share capital of a stock exchange would not be permitted to list on the same stock exchange,” said Sebi in the board note.
This means that if any board member of the listed exchange is also on the board of a listed entity then the entity would not be able to trade on it. Else, the board member would have to give up his/ her position on the board of the company or exchange.
This was a part of the initial Securities Exchange and Clearing Corporations ( SECC) regulations because of which Keki Mistry of HDFC Securities had to give up his position on the board of BSE ltd.
Another important criterion that was making it difficult for stock exchanges to list was the examination of the ‘ fit and proper’ criteria of shareholders.
Sebi has allowed shareholders to issue a self declaration of their fitness status. “During the allotment process, each applicant would be required to provide self declaration… In the post listing scenario, each shareholder shall submit quarterly an undertaking to confirm that they are fit and proper,” said Sebi.

For instance, if a shareholder is found not to be ‘ fit and proper’ as per the regulations then the shareholder would be asked to divest its stake within a time period. In the interim the shareholding of the holder would be frozen.
According to Sebi regulations, afit and proper person is defined as someone with financial integrity, good reputation and has not faced any criminal or winding up regulatory orders.
"Ensuring that every shareholder of a stock exchange is fit and proper is to avoid any systemic risk. However, any such risk would arise if a shareholder with substantial shareholding is found to be not fit.
It would have served better if Sebi had provided a threshold for examination of shareholders.
Examining every retail shareholder with small holding would be a compliance hurdle and lead to unnecessary paper work," said Tejesh Chitlangi, Partner, IC Legal.
An email sent to BSE and MSEI remained unanswered till the time of going to print.
NSE in a specific query by Business Standard stated that it was too early to comment, but they would adhere to the regulations.
If an entity acquires between two and five per cent stake, then the exchange would be required to seek approval from Sebi. Above five per cent, Sebi would clear all stakeholders and prior approval would be needed. If any entity ends up taking above the limit cleared by the regulator, then the additional shareholding, voting rights will be capped.
Business Standard, New Delhi, 23rd Dec. 2015

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Govt’s gamble on GST cuts: What do the bond and currency markets signal?

  It’s not just humans who suffer from cognitive biases; markets do too. Interestingly, different financial markets exhibit distinct biases, each interpreting events through its own prism of prejudice. Take the recent announcements on GST reforms: equity markets have chosen to view them through the lens of growth, while bond and currency markets are focusing on potential macroeconomic risks—fiscal pressures and current account challenges. So, which lens captures the true pulse?Equity markets may be right in expecting GST reforms to revive consumption, which has remained lacklustre for a while. But the key question remains—will this revival come at the cost of broader macro stability?It is well known that consumption stocks have rallied since the GST rationalisation announcement. But what about bond markets? What signals are they sending since this rejig was announced from the ramparts of the Red Fort?The signs aren't encouraging. Bond prices have slumped and yields have surged sinc...

Luxury carmakers urge clarity on GST rates to boost festive season sales

  A clear picture regarding new GST rates at the earliest will help the overall auto industry, including the luxury car segment, to regain momentum in the ongoing quarter, which generally sees enhanced sales on account of the festive season.The high-powered GST Council, chaired by Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman, will meet on September 3-4 to discuss moving to a two-slab taxation.In an interaction with PTI, BMW Group India President and CEO Hardeep Singh Brar said the recent speculation about the change in GST rates has caused uncertainty in the minds of consumers.Consumer interest and demand is strong, but they (prospective buyers) have adopted a wait-and-watch approach, and this delayed decision-making is impacting new vehicle sales at a certain level, he noted."Expediting clarity on GST rates is essential to get back to speed and ensure the auto sector's contribution to economic growth during this quarter is robust," Brar stated.He also hoped that the sustainable p...

Sebi proposes tighter norms for green bond third-party reviewers

  Sebi on Friday said it has proposed to tighten the norms to appoint independent third-party reviewers or certifiers for green debt securities to align them with requirements for other ESG-linked bonds.In a draft circular, Sebi said that the current norms for green bonds, introduced in February 2023, lack detailed requirements around reviewer independence, conflict of interest mitigation, and disclosure standards that are now in place for other ESG-linked securities under a June 2025 circular.The regulator's latest proposal seeks public comments on a revised framework that would bring parity by incorporating comprehensive criteria for third-party certifiers of green bonds on non-convertible securities.Under the proposed norms, issuers of green debt securities will need to appoint reviewers who are independent of their management, directors, and key managerial personnel. These reviewers will be remunerated in a way that prevents any conflicts of interest and possess relevant expert...