Skip to main content

Excess provident fund money has to be returned

Otherwise, EPFO can freeze your account. But seek detailed calculation to verify the numbers
Employees are always advised to try and not dip into their provident fund ( PF) corpus because it is the most important portion of their retirement corpus. Even if a company closes down, employees will get at least some part of their PF. Both the employee and employer contribute 12 per cent each of the basic salary towards employees’ provident fund ( EPF). For 2015- 16, the government has fixed the EPF rate at 8.7 per cent.
Most employees are used to getting money from the Employees Provident Fund Organisation ( EPFO) and no one is prepared for a letter from their earlier company asking to repay some amount to the EPFO. But a media company employee received such a letter, because an excess amount was paid to him. According to the letter, the EPFO has sought repayment otherwise it had threatened to freeze the account. He was asked to repay the excess amount by cheque to the Regional PF Commissioner. The EPFO gave a time- frame of about 20 days to refund the money. Says K K Jalan, Central Provident Fund Commissioner: “ It may have happened due to wrong calculation or if one subscribers PF money is transferred to another subscribers account. Sometimes, employers also credit the wrong amount. Subscribers can ask to see the calculation by registering their grievance on the EPFOs website. There is no prescribed form for this and there is no time- frame for subscribers to refund the money,” he says.
There have been such instances earlier when EPFO used to operate manually, says Malhar Majumder, a financial planner. However, these have become rare now. Excess funds get credited due to mistake in interest calculation. If you get such a notice from EPFO, always keep proof of all the documents because you will have to declare it in your Income Tax returns as well. You have no option but to return the money. But keep a copy of the receipt,” Majumder advises.
EPFO has the power to attach subscribers accounts, under the same rule that applies to companies when they default on their employees PF payment. The EPFO attaching companies accounts happens often, Jalan adds. However, according to consumer lawyer Jehangir Gai, the Act under which EPFO attaches companies accounts does not envisage excess payment or repayment. It is applicable in case of non- payment of PF. “ But if subscribers get excess money, they have to return it. It is due to an oversight on the part of EPFO. The situation is similar to issuing stop- payment orders in case of a cheque issued. Here, EPFO has found an error and is asking for refund. But it is the EPFOs duty to intimate subscribers in advance and show how the computation has been done,” Gai points out.
Suresh Sadagopan, a certified financial planner, says subscribers must always ask for a detailed calculation of the interest paid to verify that they have received excess money. “Send a mail to the EPFO and explain that you need to see the details of your account, how the interest has been calculated, etc. This is a case where the EPFO official has made a mistake.
There is no reason why subscribers should suffer,” he says. If required, one should take legal help, says Sadagopan, though it could be a long- winding process.
Business Standard, New Delhi, 8th Oct. 2015

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Govt’s gamble on GST cuts: What do the bond and currency markets signal?

  It’s not just humans who suffer from cognitive biases; markets do too. Interestingly, different financial markets exhibit distinct biases, each interpreting events through its own prism of prejudice. Take the recent announcements on GST reforms: equity markets have chosen to view them through the lens of growth, while bond and currency markets are focusing on potential macroeconomic risks—fiscal pressures and current account challenges. So, which lens captures the true pulse?Equity markets may be right in expecting GST reforms to revive consumption, which has remained lacklustre for a while. But the key question remains—will this revival come at the cost of broader macro stability?It is well known that consumption stocks have rallied since the GST rationalisation announcement. But what about bond markets? What signals are they sending since this rejig was announced from the ramparts of the Red Fort?The signs aren't encouraging. Bond prices have slumped and yields have surged sinc...

Luxury carmakers urge clarity on GST rates to boost festive season sales

  A clear picture regarding new GST rates at the earliest will help the overall auto industry, including the luxury car segment, to regain momentum in the ongoing quarter, which generally sees enhanced sales on account of the festive season.The high-powered GST Council, chaired by Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman, will meet on September 3-4 to discuss moving to a two-slab taxation.In an interaction with PTI, BMW Group India President and CEO Hardeep Singh Brar said the recent speculation about the change in GST rates has caused uncertainty in the minds of consumers.Consumer interest and demand is strong, but they (prospective buyers) have adopted a wait-and-watch approach, and this delayed decision-making is impacting new vehicle sales at a certain level, he noted."Expediting clarity on GST rates is essential to get back to speed and ensure the auto sector's contribution to economic growth during this quarter is robust," Brar stated.He also hoped that the sustainable p...

Sebi proposes tighter norms for green bond third-party reviewers

  Sebi on Friday said it has proposed to tighten the norms to appoint independent third-party reviewers or certifiers for green debt securities to align them with requirements for other ESG-linked bonds.In a draft circular, Sebi said that the current norms for green bonds, introduced in February 2023, lack detailed requirements around reviewer independence, conflict of interest mitigation, and disclosure standards that are now in place for other ESG-linked securities under a June 2025 circular.The regulator's latest proposal seeks public comments on a revised framework that would bring parity by incorporating comprehensive criteria for third-party certifiers of green bonds on non-convertible securities.Under the proposed norms, issuers of green debt securities will need to appoint reviewers who are independent of their management, directors, and key managerial personnel. These reviewers will be remunerated in a way that prevents any conflicts of interest and possess relevant expert...