Skip to main content

Don’t pursue MAT cases against FIIs: CBDT to field staff

The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) has issued instructions to field officers not to raise any fresh demand and keep in abeyance the notices sent to foreign institutional investors ( FIIs) on minimum alternate tax ( MAT) “ for the time being”. This follows the government accepting the A P Shah panel’s recommendation of doing away with MAT cases against FIIs prior to April 1 this year.

The Budget has already announced there will not be any MAT on FIIs.

As such, there will not be any follow- up action on the 68 notices sent to FIIs on past MAT cases, with a combined tax dispute amount of Rs.603 crore. Also, there won’t be any further notices in this regard.

The potential tax liability of all past MAT cases on FIIs was pegged at Rs.40,000 crore by the finance ministry.

The CBDT’s directive does away with uncertainty in this regard between now and the day when amendments to the I- T Act are carried out, based on the Shah panel’s report. The government hopes to table the amendments in the winter session of Parliament.

The CBDT has asked officers to take note of the fact that it has been decided to carry out appropriate amendments to the income tax Act “so as to prescribe that MAT provisions will not be applicable to FIIs or foreign portfolio investors ( FPIs) not having a place of business/ permanent establishment in India for the period prior to April 1, 2015.

“Accordingly, the field authorities are advised to take into consideration the above position and keep in abeyance, for the time being, the pending assessment proceedings in cases of FIIs/ FPIs. They are further advised not to pursue the recovery of outstanding demands, if any, in such cases.” On Tuesday, Finance Minister Arun Jaitley had said the government had accepted the recommendations of the Shah panel, set up to study the issue of MAT on FIIs, adding the income tax Act would be amended to clarify foreign funds won’t be subject to MAT.

The A P Shah panel sought the government either ask the CBDT to issue a circular that MAT wasn’t applicable to FIIs and FPIs prior to April 1 2015 or amend the relevant section of the I- T Act.

“FIIs are mostly open- ended investment funds, which permit their investors to enter and exit daily, based on the NAV ( net asset value) of the fund, unanticipated tax liability (or the fear thereof) relating to previous years, which would have to be borne by the current investors, maybe asufficient trigger for the investors


There will not be any follow- up action on the 68 notices sent to FIIs on past MAT cases, with a combined tax dispute amount of Rs.603 crore.

Business Standard, New Delhi, 04 September 2015

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

RBI deputy governor cautions fintech platform lenders on privacy concerns during loan recovery

  India's digital lending infrastructure has made the loan sanctioning system online. Yet, loan recovery still needs a “feet on the street” approach, Swaminathan J, deputy governor of the Reserve Bank of India, said at a media event on Tuesday, September 2, according to news agency ANI.According to the ANI report, the deputy governor flagged that fintech operators in the digital lending segment are giving out loans to customers with poor credit profiles and later using aggressive recovery tactics.“While loan sanctioning and disbursement have become increasingly digital, effective collection and recovery still require a 'feet on the street' and empathetic approach. Many fintech platforms operate on a business model that involves extending small-value loans to customers often with poor credit profiles,” Swaminathan J said.   Fintech platforms' business models The central bank deputy governor highlighted that many fintech platforms' business models involve providing sm

Credit card spending growth declines on RBI gaze, stress build-up

  Credit card spends have further slowed down to 16.6 per cent in the current financial year (FY25), following the Reserve Bank of India’s tightening of unsecured lending norms and rising delinquencies, and increased stress in the portfolio.Typically, during the festival season (September–December), credit card spends peak as several credit card-issuing banks offer discounts and cashbacks on e-commerce and other platforms. This is a reversal of trend in the past three financial years stretching to FY21 due to RBI’s restrictions.In the previous financial year (FY24), credit card spends rose by 27.8 per cent, but were low compared to FY23 which surged by 47.5 per cent. In FY22, the spending increased 54.1 per cent, according to data compiled by Macquarie Research.ICICI Bank recorded 4.4 per cent gross credit losses in its FY24 credit card portfolio as against 3.2 per cent year-on-year. SBI Cards’ credit losses in the segment stood at 7.4 per cent in FY24 and 6.2 per cent in FY23, the rep

India can't rely on wealthy to drive growth: Ex-RBI Dy Guv Viral Acharya

  India can’t rely on wealthy individuals to drive growth and expect the overall economy to improve, Viral Acharya, former deputy governor of the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) said on Monday.Acharya, who is the C V Starr Professor of Economics in the Department of Finance at New York University’s Stern School of Business (NYU-Stern), said after the Covid-19 pandemic, rural consumption and investments have weakened.We can’t be pumping our growth through the rich and expect that the economy as a whole will do better,” he said while speaking at an event organised by Elara Capital here.f there has to be a trickle-down, it should have actually happened by now,” Acharya said, adding that when the rich keep getting wealthier and wealthier, they have a savings problem.   “The bank account keeps getting bigger, hence they look for financial assets to invest in. India is closed, so our money can't go outside India that easily. So, it has to chase the limited financial assets in the country and