Skip to main content

Finmin RBI Agree on Monetary Policy Panel

Composition of committee different from that proposed in revised IFC; finance secy says IFC not the work of FSLRC
The finance ministry has reached an agreement with the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) on the contours of the monetary policy committee under the framework unveiled in the Budget, an official said, as the government sought to quell the controversy over the recently issued draft Indian Financial Code (IFC).
The composition of the committee is different from that proposed in the revised IFC, which had put government nominees at a majority four out of seven with no veto for the RBI governor.
“It has been worked out... It is different from what is proposed in the IFC,“ said the finance ministry official cited above, indicating that operative parts of the draft may have been rendered irrelevant.
Finance Secretary Rajiv Mehrishi confirmed that there had been progress independent of the IFC. “We are in discussions with RBI governor on the form and manner of the MPC (monetary policy committee). And, in fact, we now have a position which is actually agreed,“ he told reporters in New Delhi on Monday . “It will ultimately be disclosed only in Parliament,“ said Mehrishi.
The government sought to gloss over the revelation that the IFC wasn't the work of the Financial Sector Legislative Reforms Commission (FSLRC) as had been widely understood. Mehrishi suggested that the revised IFC, which was roundly criticised for seeking to usurp the powers of the central bank governor, encapsulated the view of the “people of India.“
The ministry clarified on Monday that the latest IFC version had been prepared by a group led by justice BN Srikrishna, who headed the erstwhile FSLRC, based on feedback sent to it by the government after “collating“ and “eliminating duplicacies.“
“The people of India own this draft, that is why it is in the public domain... Please see the website, it does not ascribe it to FSLRC,“ Mehrishi told the hurriedly summoned press conference. The FSLRC no longer exists, having actually been wound up after submitting its report in March 2013.
“The point is some confusion has been created because basically it is IFC 1.1,“ Mehrishi explained. “Everything is in public domain including constitution of the committee headed by Justice Srikrishna. If you look at the website, that clearly says that certain changes have been made.It does not say that it is by the FSLRC,“ he told reporters.
Srikrishna and FSLRC member M Govinda Rao have said that the latest draft doesn't reflect the commission's views, contradicting previous government pronouncements that ascribed authorship of the revised draft to the defunct commission.
Both Minister of State for Finance Jayant Sinha and Chief Economic Advisor Arvind Subramanian referred to the draft as being written by the FSLRC. Mehrishi admitted that the finance ministry had sent suggestions to the group working on the revisions. “These were various suggestions which were sent to Justice Srikrishna... And thereafter we received a draft, a second draft, which can be called IFC version 1.1, which we have put in public domain again for comments,“ Mehrishi said, adding that the government was yet to apply its mind to the report.
“A final view would be taken based on the feedback, on international best practices and thereafter in consultation with all the stakeholders...The very fact that the comments have been sought on the website is indicative of the fact that the matter is still under discussion... This is still to be considered by the government as a discussion paper,“ Mehrishi said.
He said it would be incorrect to jump to the conclusion that the government intended to curtail RBI's powers. “Government decisions are taken in a manner which is well read out... It goes out to cabinet, then it is presented to Parliament. What is government's view would ultimately be revealed in the draft Bill, which government will place before Parliament as and when it happens. As of now, government has no view on any of the 400 sections (of the IFC),“ he said.
Additional Secretary on RBI Board Mehrishi defended the finance ministry's decision to depute an additional secretary to attend RBI board meetings, rather going himself.
“I have only one point to make ­ surely the government has the right to decide who represents it,“ Mehrishi said, when asked to comment on the recent government order to this effect. “In exercise of the power conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) of section 8 of the RBI Act 1934, the central government hereby nominates Ajay Tyagi, additional secretary (investment) department of economic affairs, ministry of finance, to be director on the central board of directors of RBI with immediate effect until further order vice Rajiv Mehrishi,“ the finance ministry said in a June 22 notification.
The Economic Times, New Delhi, 4th August 2015

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

RBI deputy governor cautions fintech platform lenders on privacy concerns during loan recovery

  India's digital lending infrastructure has made the loan sanctioning system online. Yet, loan recovery still needs a “feet on the street” approach, Swaminathan J, deputy governor of the Reserve Bank of India, said at a media event on Tuesday, September 2, according to news agency ANI.According to the ANI report, the deputy governor flagged that fintech operators in the digital lending segment are giving out loans to customers with poor credit profiles and later using aggressive recovery tactics.“While loan sanctioning and disbursement have become increasingly digital, effective collection and recovery still require a 'feet on the street' and empathetic approach. Many fintech platforms operate on a business model that involves extending small-value loans to customers often with poor credit profiles,” Swaminathan J said.   Fintech platforms' business models The central bank deputy governor highlighted that many fintech platforms' business models involve providing sm

Credit card spending growth declines on RBI gaze, stress build-up

  Credit card spends have further slowed down to 16.6 per cent in the current financial year (FY25), following the Reserve Bank of India’s tightening of unsecured lending norms and rising delinquencies, and increased stress in the portfolio.Typically, during the festival season (September–December), credit card spends peak as several credit card-issuing banks offer discounts and cashbacks on e-commerce and other platforms. This is a reversal of trend in the past three financial years stretching to FY21 due to RBI’s restrictions.In the previous financial year (FY24), credit card spends rose by 27.8 per cent, but were low compared to FY23 which surged by 47.5 per cent. In FY22, the spending increased 54.1 per cent, according to data compiled by Macquarie Research.ICICI Bank recorded 4.4 per cent gross credit losses in its FY24 credit card portfolio as against 3.2 per cent year-on-year. SBI Cards’ credit losses in the segment stood at 7.4 per cent in FY24 and 6.2 per cent in FY23, the rep

India can't rely on wealthy to drive growth: Ex-RBI Dy Guv Viral Acharya

  India can’t rely on wealthy individuals to drive growth and expect the overall economy to improve, Viral Acharya, former deputy governor of the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) said on Monday.Acharya, who is the C V Starr Professor of Economics in the Department of Finance at New York University’s Stern School of Business (NYU-Stern), said after the Covid-19 pandemic, rural consumption and investments have weakened.We can’t be pumping our growth through the rich and expect that the economy as a whole will do better,” he said while speaking at an event organised by Elara Capital here.f there has to be a trickle-down, it should have actually happened by now,” Acharya said, adding that when the rich keep getting wealthier and wealthier, they have a savings problem.   “The bank account keeps getting bigger, hence they look for financial assets to invest in. India is closed, so our money can't go outside India that easily. So, it has to chase the limited financial assets in the country and