1. Admission of assessee u/s 132(4) of the Income Tax Act would suffice to initiate necessary proceedings. [Delhi High court in the case of JRD Stock Brokers (P) Ltd. vs. CIT].
2. While classifying a product for excise purpose primary use prevails over the incidental ones in classification of goods. [Holostick India Ltd. vs. CCE- Supreme Court].
3. Act of non-payment of service tax after its collection cannot be claimed to be done under a bona fide belief. [Indsur Global Ltd. vs Additional Commissioner of service tax, Vadodara (2015) 59 taxmann.com 15 (Gujarat) tribunal].
4. RBI has issued circular on "Issue of shares under Employees Stock Options Scheme and/or sweat equity shares to person’s resident outside India.
5. Entertainment tax in Delhi increased from 20% to 40% w.e.f. 20/07/2015.
2. While classifying a product for excise purpose primary use prevails over the incidental ones in classification of goods. [Holostick India Ltd. vs. CCE- Supreme Court].
3. Act of non-payment of service tax after its collection cannot be claimed to be done under a bona fide belief. [Indsur Global Ltd. vs Additional Commissioner of service tax, Vadodara (2015) 59 taxmann.com 15 (Gujarat) tribunal].
4. RBI has issued circular on "Issue of shares under Employees Stock Options Scheme and/or sweat equity shares to person’s resident outside India.
5. Entertainment tax in Delhi increased from 20% to 40% w.e.f. 20/07/2015.
Comments
Post a Comment