Skip to main content

Taxpayers can revise IT returns unlimited times

but, the original return has to be filed in the stipulated period
There are many individuals who after filing their income tax returns have realised there was a mistake in the form or the data submitted was not correct. It could be anything – certain income was not declared, postal address or bank details were wrong, or the wrong ITR form was filled.
They need not worry.
The income tax ( I- T) department allows payers to add omitted information and rectify errors if the returns were filed within the stipulated deadline. For the financial year ending 31 March, 2015, the deadline for filing returns is August 31, 2015. Interestingly, a person is allowed to amend the filing as many times he or she wishes to, but not later than 24 months from the last date of the financial year. In this case, the last date for filing ‘ revised return’ will be March 31, 2017.
Vikram Ramchand, CIO & co- founder of Makemyreturns. com gives an example of his client, who works with an information technology company. The client was in the US for financial year 2013- 14, where he had a 401 (k) account, which is a retirement savings plan. Last financial year ( 2014- 15), he was based in India, and therefore filled up ITR- 1. As per the current laws, if a taxpayer has foreign assets, he needs to fill up the form ITR- 2. As the original returns were done in time, the client could easily revise and submit the correct details.
Ramchand also points out that there is a recent judgment that even allows taxpayers to include capital losses that can be carried forward for eight years and set off against capital gains, provided the return was filed on time.
To revise the returns, all that an individual needs is the 15- digit acknowledgement number of the original tax filing and the date on which it was done. While the revision is possible for omissions and rectification, if there was any concealment of false information that was included in the original filing, the same is not allowed and the I- T department would levy a penalty. Whether it is treated as omission or concealment, however, will largely depend on the assessing officer. In case of latter, the officer can levy a penalty to the tune of 100 per cent to 300 per cent of the tax due.
To make the changes, you can either go online or for physical revision. However, if the original was filed online, then the person mandatorily needs to opt for the revision through the web/ internet. After you log in, from the drop down menu select the option -- Filing under Section 139 ( 5). You can make the required changes, pay any extra tax that is due, and get the acknowledgement number for the revised filing.
Amol Mishra, head of tax at myITreturn. com says that if the revised return lowers a person’s tax liability, his or her return is likely to come under scrutiny. Of course, individuals should not bother where the case is genuine. “ Whatever changes one makes, the person should ensure that he has the supporting documents in case the I- T department calls the taxpayer for explanation,” adds Mishra.
Experts point out that if a person is revising the returns more than once, he will need to quote the original acknowledgement number and date of filing in all subsequent revision.
For example, if a taxpayer’s original date of filing this year is August 1, for every subsequent revision, details of the tax filed on August 1 needs to be quoted. And, after filing, do remember to send the ITR- V to Bangalore CPC if your returns are not e- verified using the Aadhaar card.
Business Standard, New Delhi, 21st July 2015

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Govt’s gamble on GST cuts: What do the bond and currency markets signal?

  It’s not just humans who suffer from cognitive biases; markets do too. Interestingly, different financial markets exhibit distinct biases, each interpreting events through its own prism of prejudice. Take the recent announcements on GST reforms: equity markets have chosen to view them through the lens of growth, while bond and currency markets are focusing on potential macroeconomic risks—fiscal pressures and current account challenges. So, which lens captures the true pulse?Equity markets may be right in expecting GST reforms to revive consumption, which has remained lacklustre for a while. But the key question remains—will this revival come at the cost of broader macro stability?It is well known that consumption stocks have rallied since the GST rationalisation announcement. But what about bond markets? What signals are they sending since this rejig was announced from the ramparts of the Red Fort?The signs aren't encouraging. Bond prices have slumped and yields have surged sinc...

Luxury carmakers urge clarity on GST rates to boost festive season sales

  A clear picture regarding new GST rates at the earliest will help the overall auto industry, including the luxury car segment, to regain momentum in the ongoing quarter, which generally sees enhanced sales on account of the festive season.The high-powered GST Council, chaired by Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman, will meet on September 3-4 to discuss moving to a two-slab taxation.In an interaction with PTI, BMW Group India President and CEO Hardeep Singh Brar said the recent speculation about the change in GST rates has caused uncertainty in the minds of consumers.Consumer interest and demand is strong, but they (prospective buyers) have adopted a wait-and-watch approach, and this delayed decision-making is impacting new vehicle sales at a certain level, he noted."Expediting clarity on GST rates is essential to get back to speed and ensure the auto sector's contribution to economic growth during this quarter is robust," Brar stated.He also hoped that the sustainable p...

Sebi proposes tighter norms for green bond third-party reviewers

  Sebi on Friday said it has proposed to tighten the norms to appoint independent third-party reviewers or certifiers for green debt securities to align them with requirements for other ESG-linked bonds.In a draft circular, Sebi said that the current norms for green bonds, introduced in February 2023, lack detailed requirements around reviewer independence, conflict of interest mitigation, and disclosure standards that are now in place for other ESG-linked securities under a June 2025 circular.The regulator's latest proposal seeks public comments on a revised framework that would bring parity by incorporating comprehensive criteria for third-party certifiers of green bonds on non-convertible securities.Under the proposed norms, issuers of green debt securities will need to appoint reviewers who are independent of their management, directors, and key managerial personnel. These reviewers will be remunerated in a way that prevents any conflicts of interest and possess relevant expert...