Skip to main content

Sebi said to have concerns about forward contracts

Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi), which is set to take over regulation of commodities markets as well, is not comfortable with forward contracts in commodity exchanges, two people directly involved in the discussions between Sebi and exchange officials said.
According to them, Sebi’s concern stems from two facts: one, unlike futures contracts, forward contracts are not standardised; two, there’s greater counterparty risk associated with forward contracts.
Under the Forward Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1952, which regulates commodity trading in India, a forward contract is a contract for the actual delivery of goods, unlike a futures contract where the buyer can settle the contract in cash as well. Forward contracts were introduced in the commodity market last year, but they are not permitted in stock market.
Globally, the bulk of the forward contracts in commodities happens outside the exchange platform. Only futures and options are traded on leading commodity exchanges such as those belonging to the Chicago Mercantile Exchange (CME Group) and the London Metal Exchange (LME).
“The prime concern of Sebi is that a forward contract is not a standardized contract with complete counter-party risk guarantee, even though it is being traded on the exchange platform. Such an instrument is not allowed in the securities market and Sebi does not want to start regulating commodities with such grey areas,” said one of the people.
Currently, the National Commodity and Derivatives Exchange Ltd (NCDEX) and the National Multi-Commodity Exchange of India Ltd (NMCE) offer forward trading in various commodities. While NMCE recently launched forward contracts in rubber, NCDEX has a basket of more than 25 commodities for forward trades. Multi-Commodity Exchange of India Ltd (MCX) currently does not offer forward contracts.
“It is unlikely that Sebi would allow forward trading in the current form. It has been discussed extensively in the meetings between regulatory and exchange officials. As such, the product has not really taken off and there would be no market wide impact (if it is discontinued),” said the second person. Both the people requested anonymity.
Responding to an email query, an NCDEX spokesperson said the subject of forward contracts came up in a number of meetings between exchange and Sebi officials to discuss various aspects of the functioning and regulation of the commodity markets, but no concern was raised. “During discussions with the exchange, Sebi officials have not expressed any concern about forward contracts. NCDEX offers a refined version of forward contract... that retains innate features such as flexibility to negotiate trading parameters, while increasing ease of trading by providing a firm legal underpinning to reduce counter-party risks,” said the spokesperson.
As per NCDEX data, forward contracts worth less than Rs.59 crore were traded between December and June; the bulk of the trade happened in commodities such castor seed and chana. R.S. Loona, managing partner of Alliance Corporate Lawyers, a corporate law firm, said there have been certain issues in the commodities market with forward contracts in the past and this may weigh on Sebi’s mind. Currently, Sebi permits only futures and options in the derivatives segment.
“Sebi might try to bring the commodity contracts on par with that of the futures and options segment of the equities market. I am sure Sebi will do a lot of brainstorming on whether forwards should be allowed in commodities. Sebi is a strong and effective regulator and even if it allows, then it can monitor and regulate it,” says Loona, a former executive director with the legal department of Sebi.
The NCDEX spokesperson added that the exchange is of the view that its forward contracts introduced under the provisions of FCRA will be within the definitions included in the SCRA (Securities Contracts Regulation Act) under the Finance Act 2015.
“With the kind of resources it has, it will be relatively easy for Sebi (compared to FMC) to monitor forward trading. Ideally, Sebi would not want to start regulating commodities with any grey area, but it should look at forward trading with better regulatory framework with complete counter-party risk guarantee that is a given for any exchange-traded product,” says Girish Dev, managing director and chief executive officer, Geofin Comtrade Ltd, a commodities brokerage entity.
Emails sent to Sebi, FMC and the MCX remained unanswered till the time of going to press.
HT Mint, New Delhi, 9th July 2015

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

RBI deputy governor cautions fintech platform lenders on privacy concerns during loan recovery

  India's digital lending infrastructure has made the loan sanctioning system online. Yet, loan recovery still needs a “feet on the street” approach, Swaminathan J, deputy governor of the Reserve Bank of India, said at a media event on Tuesday, September 2, according to news agency ANI.According to the ANI report, the deputy governor flagged that fintech operators in the digital lending segment are giving out loans to customers with poor credit profiles and later using aggressive recovery tactics.“While loan sanctioning and disbursement have become increasingly digital, effective collection and recovery still require a 'feet on the street' and empathetic approach. Many fintech platforms operate on a business model that involves extending small-value loans to customers often with poor credit profiles,” Swaminathan J said.   Fintech platforms' business models The central bank deputy governor highlighted that many fintech platforms' business models involve providing sm

Credit card spending growth declines on RBI gaze, stress build-up

  Credit card spends have further slowed down to 16.6 per cent in the current financial year (FY25), following the Reserve Bank of India’s tightening of unsecured lending norms and rising delinquencies, and increased stress in the portfolio.Typically, during the festival season (September–December), credit card spends peak as several credit card-issuing banks offer discounts and cashbacks on e-commerce and other platforms. This is a reversal of trend in the past three financial years stretching to FY21 due to RBI’s restrictions.In the previous financial year (FY24), credit card spends rose by 27.8 per cent, but were low compared to FY23 which surged by 47.5 per cent. In FY22, the spending increased 54.1 per cent, according to data compiled by Macquarie Research.ICICI Bank recorded 4.4 per cent gross credit losses in its FY24 credit card portfolio as against 3.2 per cent year-on-year. SBI Cards’ credit losses in the segment stood at 7.4 per cent in FY24 and 6.2 per cent in FY23, the rep

India can't rely on wealthy to drive growth: Ex-RBI Dy Guv Viral Acharya

  India can’t rely on wealthy individuals to drive growth and expect the overall economy to improve, Viral Acharya, former deputy governor of the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) said on Monday.Acharya, who is the C V Starr Professor of Economics in the Department of Finance at New York University’s Stern School of Business (NYU-Stern), said after the Covid-19 pandemic, rural consumption and investments have weakened.We can’t be pumping our growth through the rich and expect that the economy as a whole will do better,” he said while speaking at an event organised by Elara Capital here.f there has to be a trickle-down, it should have actually happened by now,” Acharya said, adding that when the rich keep getting wealthier and wealthier, they have a savings problem.   “The bank account keeps getting bigger, hence they look for financial assets to invest in. India is closed, so our money can't go outside India that easily. So, it has to chase the limited financial assets in the country and