Skip to main content

Panel likely to seek more time for land bill review

Panel is now expected to submit its report on 5 August, leaving little time for NDA to push forward the legislation
The problems for the National Democratic Alliance (NDA) government in the ongoing session of Parliament don’t seem to be ending soon, with the joint parliamentary committee, discussing the controversial land acquisition bill, likely to ask for a further extension from the Rajya Sabha.
The committee has already asked for two extensions, and another extension will lead to further delay in submission of the report on a key reform legislation that the central government is keen to push through to boost economic growth.
The committee is likely to give its report on 5 August, which will give the government just six working days to take up the land acquisition bill for discussion in both houses of the Parliament before the session ends on 13 August.
“It was decided in the meeting to ask for further extension of two days. The report was supposed to be submitted on 3 August but now it is likely to be submitted on 5 August. The top bureaucrats of law and justice ministry and rural development ministry were present at the meeting. They have decided to start the clause-by-clause discussion from 29 July and then prepare the report,” a person aware of the development said on condition of anonymity.
The committee was initially supposed to give its report on 21 July—the first working day of the monsoon session. Even before it submits its report, there are signs of a division in the 30-member panel.
Members of the Congress, the Samajwadi Party (SP), the Trinamool Congress (TMC) and Communist Party of India (Marxist) are all against the bill. There are more problems for the government as Shiv Sena and Republican Party of India (Athawale), both constituents of the NDA led by Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), are against the changes in the bill. Ally Shiromani Akali Dal (SAD) also wants the government to hold more discussions with farmers before making any move to amend the existing law.
“The reasons for the delay in compiling and submitting the report appear political to me,” said N.C Saxena, former secretary with the rural development ministry. “The report could cause more upsets and disruptions in Parliament than we are seeing at the moment,” he said, pointing to the divisions over the bill among different parties.
The government is facing problems in both houses of the Parliament due to repeated adjournments.
The Lok Sabha on Monday saw repeated adjournments for the sixth consecutive day. The opposition parties, led by the Congress and the Left parties, have demanded that external affairs minister Sushma Swaraj, Rajasthan chief minister Vasundhara Raje and Madhya Pradesh chief minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan resign. The opposition wants Swaraj and Raje to resign for allegedly helping former IPL chief Lalit Modi and Chouhan to quit over the Vyapam scam.
The central government introduced the new land acquisition bill in Parliament earlier this year to replace a 2013 law that makes it compulsory for people acquiring farmland for non-agricultural purposes to secure the consent of 70% of affected landowners for public-private partnership projects and 80% of landowners for private projects.
It also makes a social impact assessment mandatory.
Businesses and industries complain that the two provisions have made land acquisition difficult. The 2015 amendment bill, removing the two provisions, has been passed by the Lok Sabha where the BJP and its allies are in a majority. However, it is stuck in the Rajya Sabha where opposition parties outnumber the ruling coalition.
The 2015 bill removes the social impact assessment and the consent clauses for land acquired for the purposes of defence, rural infrastructure, electrification, affordable housing, industrial corridors and social infrastructure.
Earlier in July, Union finance minister Arun Jaitley had said one of the options that the central government could look at was allowing states to draft their own land acquisition laws that the central government would then approve.
HT Mint, New Delhi,28th July 2015

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Govt’s gamble on GST cuts: What do the bond and currency markets signal?

  It’s not just humans who suffer from cognitive biases; markets do too. Interestingly, different financial markets exhibit distinct biases, each interpreting events through its own prism of prejudice. Take the recent announcements on GST reforms: equity markets have chosen to view them through the lens of growth, while bond and currency markets are focusing on potential macroeconomic risks—fiscal pressures and current account challenges. So, which lens captures the true pulse?Equity markets may be right in expecting GST reforms to revive consumption, which has remained lacklustre for a while. But the key question remains—will this revival come at the cost of broader macro stability?It is well known that consumption stocks have rallied since the GST rationalisation announcement. But what about bond markets? What signals are they sending since this rejig was announced from the ramparts of the Red Fort?The signs aren't encouraging. Bond prices have slumped and yields have surged sinc...

Luxury carmakers urge clarity on GST rates to boost festive season sales

  A clear picture regarding new GST rates at the earliest will help the overall auto industry, including the luxury car segment, to regain momentum in the ongoing quarter, which generally sees enhanced sales on account of the festive season.The high-powered GST Council, chaired by Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman, will meet on September 3-4 to discuss moving to a two-slab taxation.In an interaction with PTI, BMW Group India President and CEO Hardeep Singh Brar said the recent speculation about the change in GST rates has caused uncertainty in the minds of consumers.Consumer interest and demand is strong, but they (prospective buyers) have adopted a wait-and-watch approach, and this delayed decision-making is impacting new vehicle sales at a certain level, he noted."Expediting clarity on GST rates is essential to get back to speed and ensure the auto sector's contribution to economic growth during this quarter is robust," Brar stated.He also hoped that the sustainable p...

Sebi proposes tighter norms for green bond third-party reviewers

  Sebi on Friday said it has proposed to tighten the norms to appoint independent third-party reviewers or certifiers for green debt securities to align them with requirements for other ESG-linked bonds.In a draft circular, Sebi said that the current norms for green bonds, introduced in February 2023, lack detailed requirements around reviewer independence, conflict of interest mitigation, and disclosure standards that are now in place for other ESG-linked securities under a June 2025 circular.The regulator's latest proposal seeks public comments on a revised framework that would bring parity by incorporating comprehensive criteria for third-party certifiers of green bonds on non-convertible securities.Under the proposed norms, issuers of green debt securities will need to appoint reviewers who are independent of their management, directors, and key managerial personnel. These reviewers will be remunerated in a way that prevents any conflicts of interest and possess relevant expert...