Skip to main content

MCA NUDGE TO TWEAK RULES ON RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS Govt Push May Put Sebi in a Spot

By
TOUGH TIMES Market participants to appeal to Sebi against relaxing its stand on protecting minority shareholders
The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) may find itself on a tricky terrain over the government's nudge to change rules on related party transactions in corporates.
In a move towards promoting ease of doing business, the ministry of corporate affairs (MCA) has asked the regulator to tweak rules to make them at par with those under the Companies Act 2013. This has raised concerns among market participants about a dilution in Sebi's stand on protection of minority shareholders. Experts and shareholder advisory firms, which believe Sebi should hold its ground on the issue, will soon take up the matter with the regulator.The MCA changed its stand on related party transactions in 2014, when it lowered the threshold for minority shareholder votes for listed companies from 75% to 50% for passing resolutions. It also allowed voting by `related parties' while barring only interested parties'.
“MCA's goal is to improve the ease of doing business while Sebi is for protecting investors. Therefore, while MCA can dilute its stance on related party transactions, Sebi will be better served in not doing so,“ said a report by IiAS, a proxy advisory firm. “Preventing interested parties, but allowing related parties to vote takes away all meaning. Most promoters hold stake through a series of entities (companies, trusts, and partnerships) that is spread across a catalogue of family members. Thus, with the amendment of the Companies Act 2013, the family and promoter entities not directly involved in the transaction can vote on it since they may not be interested parties. This cuts the power of minority shareholders at the knees. Promoters will likely manipulate their holding structure to get their way and minority shareholders may be unable to block unfair transactions,“ said IiAS.
Most of the times there is ambiguity regarding the kind of transactions that would be put to vote. The Companies Act 2013 states that transactions in the ordinary course of business that are done at an arm's length does not require any shareholder approval. But, how do companies define `ordinary course of businesses ­ is a question that experts are now raising. The new Companies Act neither provides a definition nor does it give any framework for defining transaction that can be kept at an arm's length.
“Jurisprudence shows that Sebi can set higher standards for listed companies. Therefore, the regulator should not dilute its stand as it would be a loss for minority shareholders,“ said Sandeep Parekh, founder, Finsec Law Advisors. “A dichotomy does not seem to exist between related party and interested party . Any kind of related party is interest party in most transactions. Hence, there should be no debate on this.“ An IiAS study showed that only 9 out of the top 30 S&P BSE Sensex companies had attempted to define ordinary course of business with regard to related party transactions. Sebi's method for defining related party transactions that may come for vote is much clear: all transactions that account for more than 10% of company's turnover need to be put to vote.
Few companies have designed long flow charts to help their internal teams and board members decide if a transaction needs board or shareholder approval. Such complexity is unnecessary and an alignment of regulations is imperative -in the interest of minority shareholders. “In the interest of minority shareholders, the Companies Act 2013 needs to align itself to SEBI's Clause 49 requirements for listed companies,“ said the IiAS report.
According to Tejesh Chitlangi, Partner at IC Legal, “There are precedents wherein Sebi has aligned its provisions with the new Companies Act -for instance, permitting the pre-emptive rights in shareholders agreements in line with the new companies' law provisions. Since any conflicting provisions cause uncertainty and practical difficulties, the same need to be harmonised. Sebi laws are likely to be more weighed towards investors, but the same may not continue to be conflicting with any company law provisions and hence should be appropriately modified to the extent warranted.“
The Economic Times, New Delhi, 11th July 2015

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Data storage norm splits digital payments industry

By
Data storage norm splits digital payments industry  India’s nascent digital payment industry could be thrown into disarray due to the demand by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) that all user data be stored within the country, fears an industry grouping, which has termed the decision as “heavy-handed”, even as others, including the country’s largest digital payment provider Paytm, have hailed the move.  In a bid to narrow the growing schism, the industry is planning to send a formal representation to the regulator highlighting its concerns, a top official told ET.  “We are trying to build a consensus on the issue," said the person adding that the representation to the central bank will be ready this week.  RBI on April 6, mandated all payment companies—global and local—to set up data storage facilities within India by October. The stringent six-month deadline has attracted the ire of several sections of the industry that fear it will lead to a disruption of wel...
18 comments
Read more

Offer’s for all of you

By
Great Bumper Dhamaka Offer’s for all of you... It's Time to see your Business Online, WebeCreator Offer Website Designing with domain & Email @ nominal charges. For a year For More information visit us http://goo.gl/KlpppF call on 9890151261/9773197533  drop a mail to sales@webecreator.com
Post a Comment
Read more

Sebi to finalise options in commodities today

By
The Commodity Derivatives Advisory Committee of the Securities and Exchange Board of India ( Sebi) will meet on Friday with senior officials of the latter, to give a final shape to the rules on options trading in commodity futures, beside revising the warehousing norms to ensure good delivery on settlement. The decision taken, after discussing with the advisory committee, will be placed before the regulator’s board, to finalise the regulations. According to knowledgeable sources, three commodities in each segment, agricultural and non- agricultural, have been proposed for introducing options. It appears commodities from the soya and guar segments are preferred in the former. From the non- agri segment, it is likely that gold, silver and crude oil will be finalised. All these These have better liquidity and both the National Commodity and Derivatives Exchange and the Multi Commodity Exchange, respectively, will be able to introduce the options. In the equity segments, options ar...
17 comments
Read more