CA Online

The Securities and Exchange Board of India ( Sebi) has notified amended listing regulations that allow listed companies to seek shareholders’ approval for related party deals through ordinary resolutions. Besides, Sebi’s provisions for listed entities have been aligned with those of the Companies Act, 2013. The latest listing norms, finalised after consultations, will consolidate and streamline the provisions of existing listing agreements for different segments of the capital market. “The regulations have thus been structured to provide ease of reference by consolidating into one single document across various types of securities listed on stock exchanges,” Sebi said. While a 90- day period has been given to implement the norms, Sebi said two provisions in the revised rules that are facilitating in nature would be applicable with immediate effect. One pertains to “ passing of ordinary resolution instead of special resolution in the case of all material related party transactions subj

The recent law commission report critical of many provisions in the proposed Bilateral Investment Treaty ( BIT) may not lead to any changes in the Cabinet note on the treaty expected to come up for clearance later this month. The report, which was submitted to Law Minister Sadananda Gowda on August 27, says the proposed BIT has provisions which can be seen as having an ‘ anti- investor bias’ and which defeat the purpose of having a bilateral treaty itself. Among its toughest proposals, the BIT says that international tribunals would not have jurisdiction to re- examine any legal issue settled by, or review judgements of, an Indian judicial authority. Business Standard, New Delhi, 04 September 2015

The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) has issued instructions to field officers not to raise any fresh demand and keep in abeyance the notices sent to foreign institutional investors ( FIIs) on minimum alternate tax ( MAT) “ for the time being”. This follows the government accepting the A P Shah panel’s recommendation of doing away with MAT cases against FIIs prior to April 1 this year. The Budget has already announced there will not be any MAT on FIIs. As such, there will not be any follow- up action on the 68 notices sent to FIIs on past MAT cases, with a combined tax dispute amount of Rs.603 crore. Also, there won’t be any further notices in this regard. The potential tax liability of all past MAT cases on FIIs was pegged at Rs.40,000 crore by the finance ministry. The CBDT’s directive does away with uncertainty in this regard between now and the day when amendments to the I- T Act are carried out, based on the Shah panel’s report. The government hopes to table the amendments in

India is likely to defer the adoption of new accounting standard on revenue recognition, known as Ind AS 115, as the country's accounting standards panel feels that more consultation with the industry is needed to clarify its stringent requirements. The National Advisory Committee on Accounting Standard (NACAS) has favoured deferring implementation of Ind AS 115 in its recommendations submitted to the ministry of corporate affairs (MCA), a panel member said. “Let them take a final call on it,“ the person said. The new standard would have required stringent disclosures. Under this standard, revenue from services would have to be unbundled and shown separately in the books. As per the government roadmap, all . 500 crore companies, with net worth of ` or more (whether listed or unlisted), should move to Ind AS (which has been converged with International financial Reporting Standards) from financial year beginning on or after April 1, 2016. International Accounting Standards Body (IA

Suddenly, Trusts Face the Assault of Tax Hounds I-T dept seeks to look through discretionary trusts to go after the beneficiaries Indian tax authorities will ignore conventions to pierce trust structures used by most people to stash black money abroad. Persons who are named as beneficiaries in overseas discretionary trusts are likely to face enquiry even if they do not receive any money from such trusts. The taxman will look through the trust and lift the veil with the basic presumption that the fund a trust holds belongs to the beneficiaries and not some foreigners or non-resident Indians (NRIs). Typically, nonresidents who are outside the jurisdiction of Indian tax office act as trustees and set trustees and settlors to form and administer trusts in places such as Panama, Dubai, British Virgin Islands and Singapore. Indeed, the income-tax department expects beneficiaries of undisclosed offshore trusts to come clean and declare under the black money law that they are the real benefic

Classification based on environment impact will bring uniformity in time frame for approvals The proposed new classification of industries based on environment impact will bring uniformity in time frame for approvals and will give boost to manufacturing in India. Manufacturing is important for India’s sustained high economic growth and Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s ‘Make In India’ programme. However, the latest industrial production data has not been encouraging as manufacturing growth has not been high. Industry experts believe that rationalisation of industries under red, orange and green categories and introduction of a new category white will end inspector raj in environmental regulation. As per the Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB), the new mechanism will complement tamper proof online submission of emission and effluent data. The government has made online submission mandatory for Red category or most polluting industries and subsequently it will be extended to Orange cate

In a move that could add real bite to India’s war on black money, the Swiss Federal Council on Wednesday approved a bill that would allow the government to share “stolen data” with other countries. The council, Switzerland’s highest executive authority, said in a statement: “The Federal Council initiated the consultation proceedings on the revision of the Tax Administrative Assistance Act, which provides for an easing of Swiss practices with regard to stolen data. Partner countries find Switzerland’s current practice too restrictive… the most pertinent illustration is the case of India (HSBC list).” The statement said that it would now be possible to respond to requests if a foreign country has obtained the “stolen data” via normal administrative assistance channels or from public sources. Switzerland has for long maintained that its domestic laws don’t acknowledge leaked data that is considered “stolen”. This stance has thwarted New Delhi’s probe into a list of more than 600 account