Skip to main content

Posts

GST Council Eyes 16% Levy on Gold Jewellery & 4% on Bullion

The Goods and Services Tax Council, which will decide the GST rates, has discussed levying 16% GST rate on gold jewellery, cutting customs duty on gold to 2% from 10%, and levying 4% GST on gold bullion, two persons privy to the discussions told ET. If implemented, a buyer of gold jewellery will end up paying around 6 percentage more by way of tax as at present the total tax comes to around 12.5%, but the proposal will discourage smuggling as the cost to import gold will fall by 4 percentage points to 6% -4% GST and 2% customs duty. The move will ensure the Centre will not suffer any tax loss while states will get much more than the present 1% VAT on gold. Here's how. The Centre currently gets 10% through customs duty. If duty is cut to 2% and GST of 4% is levied on gold, half of the GST will go to states and Centre gets a total of 4% --2% GST and 2% customs.And when states collect 12% GST on gold jewellery (adjusting for input credit) revenue sharing will enable the Centre

File a consumer case jointly for faster relief

Ensure all of you have a common grievance; new national forum verdict loosens rule In the past, many judges at the National Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission (NCDRC) did not allow consumers to file a case jointly because of a technicality in the law. But, a recent judgment by an NCDRC Bench has given some respite to such consumers, especially home buyers seeking relief against developers. If the amount in dispute is up to Rs.20 lakh, the law mandates individuals to approach district consumer forums. For amounts over Rs.20 lakh and up to Rs.1 crore, they need to seek relief from state forums. One may only approach the national forum or NCDRC, for amounts over Rs.1 crore. What if three flat owners, who individually paid Rs.50 lakh for a house in the same project, decide to approach a consumer court? While they don’t qualify individually, together the amount in dispute comes to Rs.1.5 crore. “Until now, only a few judges permitted such consumers to do a joint filing at the nat

Change ATM PIN immediately

Recently, many customers have got mails and messages from their banks to change the ATM PIN of their debit cards. We now know the reason, with reports suggesting 3.2 million accounts in five leading banks -State Bank of India, Axis Bank, ICICI Bank, HDFC Bank and YES Bank -- are compromised. Bankers and cyber experts advise that ideally an ATM PIN should be changed every three to six months. Are they being overly cautious? Perhaps not. Several banks have already asked their customers to change their card security details and to stick to own ATM networks. According to Reshmi Khurana, country head-operations for Kroll Advisory Solutions, there are reports of customers reporting transactions on their debit cards in China, which is how banks came to know of the breach of data security. A certain foreign payment services company, whose system is believed to have been compromised, is going for a forensic audit. “While it is not confirmed, the breach of data seems to be on account of a

CBDT issues final rules for taxing share buy back by companies

Seeking to minimise litigations over taxation, CBDT has come out with rules for computing distributed income arising out of issue of shares following buy back, demerger, amalgamation or bonus issue by companies. The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) has introduced new Rule 44BB for computing amount received by a company in respect of issue of share for computing buy back tax payable. The rules take effect from June 1, 2016. The final rules provide for computation mechanism of 'amount received' in 12 different scenarios depending upon the manner of issue of shares — regular issue, amalgamation, demerger, bonus issue, conversion of bond or debenture, sweat equity share issue and share-buyback in demat form. The clarification with respect to the amount received by a company in case of ESOP or sweat equity shares is quite logical and would go a long way in rationalising the tax impact arising on buy back of such shares, experts said. "In absence of clear provisions in t

Small savings schemes are still attractive

For longer tenure products, they offer higher returns compared to other instruments. But for shorter tenures, things are getting tighter for investors Despite the recent interest rate cuts in small savings schemes; they still remain attractive for retail investors. For the October-December quarter, the government has reduced interest rates by 10 basis points across the schemes. The one-year fixed deposit now carries seven per cent interest rate. The returns on two, three, and five-year deposits are 7.1 per cent, 7.3 per cent and 7.8 per cent, respectively. The short-term rates, up to two years, are almost on a par with those of all big banks. But in deposits over five years, small savings scheme scores. SBI offers only seven per cent on fixed deposits above three years. Among private banks, ICICI Bank and HDFC have comparable rates compared to Small Savings Schemes for tenures less than five years. But for five years or more, these banks offer interest rates of 7.25 per cent. How

Jewellery exporters seek duty exemption under GST

With the government attempting to arrive at a final rate of the goods and services tax (GST) through consensus among stakeholders, the Gems & Jewellery Export Promotion Council (GJEPC) has demanded that the precious metals and stones industry be kept under the lowest rate slab. According to GJEPC Chairman Praveenshankar Pandya, any adverse tax structure would result in India losing its leadership position in diamond cutting and processing. Currently, import of rough diamond attracts ‘nil’ duty, while exports of cut and polished diamond are under ‘zero’ duty regime. “Thus, the entire gold and jewellery sector is currently under ‘nil’ duty regime. Any adverse duty levy on this sector would hit the entire value chain of diamond and jewellery sectors. Therefore we, based on a survey conducted over nine months across our 7,000 registered members, arrived at a conclusion that a recommendation should be sent to the government seeking exemption of gems and jewellery sector under GST,

India Inc to lobby against imposition of cess

India Inc may prefer a higher rate at the top end of the goods and services tax (GST) bracket, rather than have a cess that is non-creditable by nature, with a cascading effect on the indirect tax system. "Industry is not going to welcome the idea of a cess. In fact, industry may prefer a higher tax rate so that the input tax credit chain is not broken, and the whole indirect system remains less complicated," said Harishanker Subramaniam, national leader, indirect tax, EY India. Tax experts say imposing a cess is a bad idea as it complicates the structure of GST. Pratik Jain, leader indirect tax, PwC India, agrees that cesses, if imposed, will lead to cascading of taxes and complicate the overall GST structure. "Increasing the rate of GST slightly might be a better solution," he adds. Tax experts and corporate lawyers say the government in all its communications on GST highlighted that all cesses and surcharges would be subsumed under the new indirect tax re